Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS

Ivo Sedlacek <ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4EC1A02ED for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:58:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0UVTC0cVVBma for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4941A029E for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:57:55 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f038e000005d01-35-52fcf9913329
Received: from ESESSHC022.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 75.8D.23809.199FCF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:57:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.164]) by ESESSHC022.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:57:53 +0100
From: Ivo Sedlacek <ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com>
To: Jiri Kuthan <jiri@iptel.org>, "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, Harvind Samra <harvind@rangenetworks.com>
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS
Thread-Index: AQHPKNhhkrZYui7Q4Eii0l2hGkNSOZqzZPjg
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:57:52 +0000
Message-ID: <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B3107900610112662679@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
References: <040E1A40-BC55-4CFC-834A-FC958DEFDE25@rangenetworks.com> <00C069FD01E0324C9FFCADF539701DB3BBF23E22@sc9-ex2k10mb1.corp.yaanatech.com> <CAHBDyN5-O3pNury3RUNzstGHO8NCq6pV3ewHt_Yrxjd1k-if5Q@mail.gmail.com> <948FB37B-F2D4-4462-8B29-D03FDF65215F@rangenetworks.com> <93B4EA30-0734-439E-A129-B3B91B077720@rangenetworks.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B12F6C3@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <2B05935E-EB65-4B36-ABD3-09DE9921F8A7@westhawk.co.uk> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B12F7CE@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CACy T-3mAJX4uPDcXDz7j6xOAA+OSDoRguQ51EvZk9=LTG8KzJQ@mail.gmail.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B12FA06@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <DE4C1B56-0D67-4210-9FFA-EC0BC866E081@westhawk.co.uk> <201402121601.s1CG1q0W4835781@shell01.TheWorld.com> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B3107900610112662068@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <017BBEA0-CDBE-453D-9E98-77F470BC9181@rangenetworks.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B1319E6@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <52FCF23D.7070608@iptel.org>
In-Reply-To: <52FCF23D.7070608@iptel.org>
Accept-Language: en-US, cs-CZ
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7En3+CDNpu6losnbSA1WLr5Wls FqeWnmaxeNp4ltGBxaP12V5WjyVLfjJ57J5yjNXjzMn0AJYoLpuU1JzMstQifbsEroxzJxcw FZwWqrj3fjZ7A+Nzvi5GDg4JAROJhaeTuxg5gUwxiQv31rN1MXJxCAkcYpRoub2VBcJZwijx 4PVaZpAqNgE9iYlbjrCC2CICbYwSzcsFQGxmAW2J/9fXMYLYwgKmEiuntkDVmElMmjaLGcI2 krjX8ZoJxGYRUJV4/3kVO4jNK+ArMffwB6hl8zkk+o/sAmvgFNCUeDmnlwXEZhSQlbj6p5cR Ypm4xK0n85kgzhaQWLLnPDOELSrx8vE/VghbSWLF9ktQ9XoSN6ZOYYM5dNnC18wQiwUlTs58 wjKBUWwWkrGzkLTMQtIyC0nLAkaWVYzsuYmZOenlRpsYgbF0cMtv1R2Md86JHGKU5mBREuf9 8NY5SEggPbEkNTs1tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAjEwenVANj4eG9tfOtrcUZNGfbqpbaW7KtX3WMafq6 zWEx6U9n7eC4H5ORardOdoZlSehuHqP72yJ2/knX26507ehvbouGJmWFC5firx/Os2G4dula aMtux4L8HTO66p2sWtl+LU/OePrquJXAIZ0GYfYpD54ECBsabD8g8MD8yv+vzNuO6ype+Sq3 aKOsEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAnh3JU3MCAAA=
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:58:00 -0000

The question should be:

	Should IETF work on a new solution for a market where a solution exists and the existing solution is equal or superior to the newly proposed one?

Argument for statement "the existing solution is equal or superior to the newly proposed one" is:
- the existing 3GPP solution is already developed, tested, mass produced and mass deployed and thus benefits from economies of scale.
- no existing 3GPP requirement was identified as unnecessary for the new solution so complexity of the existing solution and new solution is the same.

If you believe that statement "the existing solution is equal or superior to the newly proposed one" is incorrect, please prove it.

Kind regards

Ivo Sedlacek

-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] 
Sent: 13. února 2014 17:27
To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Harvind Samra; Ivo Sedlacek
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS

On 2/13/14 3:34 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> Jumping in here, they are relevant in as much as there is no point in IETF working on this if there is no known market for it.

Hi Keith,

are you suggesting that IETF processes shall only allow work on technologies for which there is a known market?

I'm glad this was not the case in the past, otherwise I would not be able to send a single email. At least I don't have memory of IETF business case criteria for the SNMP protocol. If that shall change in the future, I would like to know what is the specific IETF criteria for market existence. Can you elaborate what these are supposed to be?

-jiri

p.s. one more question here: I understand your point that I'm eligible to read emails to this WG mailing list that carry confidentiality notice on the grounds of group memership. What I don't understand is whether I'm also permitted (in departure from the notice) to forward such an email to some other email address than that of the working group.


> Usually those type of projects are published only on April 1st.
> So all Ivo is asking is for you to justify that it is worth other people working on this as well as yourselves.
> Perhaps if you identified the spectrum you believe is available for use in the the countries identified, that would be useful.
> regards
> Keith Drage