Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 06 February 2014 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD191A02A1 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:18:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OMSmp7HGnwVD for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoemail2.alcatel.com (hoemail2.alcatel.com [192.160.6.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7015B1A021F for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by hoemail2.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s160IeVN021434 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:18:41 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s160IdvD010235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 01:18:39 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.26]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 01:18:39 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, Michael Hammer <michael.hammer@yaanatech.com>
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS
Thread-Index: AQHPIsChkF9riHfhQ0Se4gDBfVRQX5qnLcIAgAAAUICAAABkgIAAB1CAgAAFbICAAAB6AIAAH4Dw
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:18:38 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B12AEA6@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <040E1A40-BC55-4CFC-834A-FC958DEFDE25@rangenetworks.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B12A6DE@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <60884D2D-1CC8-4A21-97BE-2ACCB49C351D@rangenetworks.com> <7723B448-642F-4138-89DD-379ACC7FA593@rangenetworks.com> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17826DFCD495@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <F5DA260C-32C9-4D92-9169-2026983BFC47@gmail.com> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17826DFCD852@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <77E6DEC0-BCE1-4607-B52C-A4B6761A4B17@gmail.com> <00C069FD01E0324C9FFCADF539701DB3BBF23E22@sc9-ex2k10mb1.corp.yaanatech.com> <CAHBDyN5-O3pNury3RUNzstGHO8NCq6pV3ewHt_Yrxjd1k-if5Q@mail.gmail.com> <00C069FD01E0324C9FFCADF539701DB3BBF23F45@sc9-ex2k10mb1.corp.yaanatech.com> <CAHBDyN50_zO1Lb48y=MU3++M8YeV7gWDtNudHjrGhrW+wQgB0A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN50_zO1Lb48y=MU3++M8YeV7gWDtNudHjrGhrW+wQgB0A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B12AEA6FR712WXCHMBA11zeu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:18:47 -0000

To impact SIP we need some clearer requirements. Use of GERAN as an access technology hardly allows to concept of a network architecture.

That is where my points have been going.

3GPP started with a set of requirements, many of which will be applicable here, and we need to know which, and any additional ones.

Keith

________________________________
From: dispatch [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
Sent: 05 February 2014 23:21
To: Michael Hammer
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS




On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Michael Hammer <michael.hammer@yaanatech.com<mailto:michael.hammer@yaanatech.com>> wrote:
Mary,

What I was hoping to avoid was full-blown tutorials on 3GPP and IMS.
As well as discussion about what parts of 3GPP are signaling versus something else.
[MB] Yes, I totally agree. Thanks for that clarification. [/MB]

Distinguishing what the impacts of OpenBTS on SIP are versus what is in use for 3GPP
could clarify if we would be doing the same thing but with redundant headers, for example, would be useful.

Just didn't want to lose sight of the touchstone (how does this impact SIP).

Michael Hammer
Principal Engineer
michael.hammer@yaanatech.com<mailto:michael.hammer@yaanatech.com>
Mobile: +1 408-202-9291<tel:408-202-9291>
500 Yosemite Drive Suite 120
Milpitas, CA 95035 USA

From: Mary Barnes [mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com<mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 6:00 PM
To: Michael Hammer
Cc: a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com<mailto:a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>; Raju.Makaraju@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:Raju.Makaraju@alcatel-lucent.com>; dispatch@ietf.org<mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>

Subject: Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS

I don't necessarily think 3GPP is out of scope in that I think it's very important that if IETF decides that we will be documenting or even defining protocol elements to support OpenBTS, it needs to be clear why 3GPP Call control/SIP specifications aren't being used.

In offline in discussions with the proponents, it's my understanding that OpenBTS is being used in very specific environments where there is no full MSC deployments (i.e., remote locations that have no deployed IMS networks).  The intent isn't to replicate a full IMS system, but rather to provide basic connectivity to the Internet and use SIP in a non-IMS context to complete the calls.   So, I think more detail about this context would be very helpful.

I think it would really help if there were some diagrams showing what IMS protocols are being used.  My understanding is that current implementations have various ways in which they are interworking the Radio Layer Call Control messages to SIP messages.  I think the motivation is to improve interop by defining a consistent "mapping" if you will.  It's not clear to me how exactly registration is being handled - perhaps mapping some of the Radio Layer mobility management messages.   My understanding is that there can be no change to the existing messages from the cell phone to the BTS for obvious reasons, so all the interworking needs to happen in the BTS.

Regards,
Mary.

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Michael Hammer <michael.hammer@yaanatech.com<mailto:michael.hammer@yaanatech.com>> wrote:
Could we take debates about 3GPP off-line?
Seems to be getting off-topic.

Michael Hammer
Principal Engineer
michael.hammer@yaanatech.com<mailto:michael.hammer@yaanatech.com>
Mobile: +1 408-202-9291<tel:408-202-9291>
500 Yosemite Drive Suite 120
Milpitas, CA 95035 USA

From: dispatch [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of James Winterbottom
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 5:33 PM
To: Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org<mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS

Check out SLh.
Check out SLg

On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:31 am, Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju) <Raju.Makaraju@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:Raju.Makaraju@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:


DIAMETER is used to carry signalling information through out IMS.
[Raju] Which interface? and what kind of signaling? To the best of my knowledge, diameter is only used for "authentication, authorization, and accounting". The Rx diameter interface used between P-CSCF and PCRF is not really call processing related signaling but rather used for "authorization" of the media flow.

-Raju


_______________________________________________
dispatch mailing list
dispatch@ietf.org<mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch