IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS

tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk> Wed, 05 February 2014 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D01A1A01AF for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:39:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OoAfyRa-Nokm for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp002.apm-internet.net (smtp002.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.221]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE741A0192 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 42026 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2014 15:39:03 -0000
X-AV-Scan: clean
X-APM-Authkey: 83769 11718
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp002.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 5 Feb 2014 15:39:03 -0000
Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25C518A0451; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:39:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [172.16.0.102] (unknown [37.191.118.68]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B05A918A0205; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:39:02 +0000 (GMT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00C069FD01E0324C9FFCADF539701DB3BBF2361F@sc9-ex2k10mb1.corp.yaanatech.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:39:01 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA6CC65F-1613-4DA2-BC40-AC7BD9CE6BAD@westhawk.co.uk>
References: <040E1A40-BC55-4CFC-834A-FC958DEFDE25@rangenetworks.com> <52F25265.5070108@alum.mit.edu> <00C069FD01E0324C9FFCADF539701DB3BBF2361F@sc9-ex2k10mb1.corp.yaanatech.com>
To: Michael Hammer <michael.hammer@yaanatech.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] SIP and GSM/UMTS with OpenBTS
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:39:14 -0000

On 5 Feb 2014, at 15:18, Michael Hammer <michael.hammer@yaanatech.com> wrote:

> 
> Is the end result of this improvements to the SIP or other IETF protocols?

Speaking entirely for myself (as one does in the IETF) I’d guess that the outcome might
be some small improvements in SIP and other protocols (SDP or RTP perhaps) due to the fact
that the usage is slightly out of the ordinary so may well trip an edge case or something.

> Or, does this attempt to standardize an architecture?

I’d like it to standardise an _interface_ so that multiple architectures can interoperate.

> 
> Also, is there any IPR attached to this?

I’ll let Jim answer that when he wakes up in India, but as an old (but lapsed) IETF hand I’m sure 
he’s aware of the IPR rules.

> 
> Michael Hammer
> Principal Engineer
> michael.hammer@yaanatech.com
> Mobile: +1 408-202-9291
> 500 Yosemite Drive Suite 120
> Milpitas, CA 95035 USA
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email