Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 04 December 2020 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E003A0E25 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:34:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7fX7yuGbeKTi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:34:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78ED3A0E22 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:34:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id z12so4047445pjn.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:34:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=IzfZKBuIrkGuaj0ud7MauCqEfH6pu7dQzenwJJ9HZWM=; b=lwJ9jK4gLDkpmPW4NpKXlOjFor4mtu0GhT6VLo0/SpU2RwdYvimiFQCdkiivY+5Kl/ AzNIldx8BS29B9zFrAp5Xku+BHW+3kzDiCzqBFrfiKxhoEVWopIdHtScAYLFAblNvrJo Cw3DReEYuZY/N3v4EoO7+ExeJHfycJkZwoXKh1Tgg5Kj9KtGgj+pxwWYG3xJkuQTEHM+ k50gOTq+IL/ITgl8nXejVsXfIrCzyNmEacrs/8s0ZhgUCAj5yp3KAeqC/AkyeClgAduQ lg2eLlGDxlAQbEsHb+CFpORde+X3wdUHubX+ecwFsUVmQIc11kqH8Q7qisP9D60xK4Cj drKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=IzfZKBuIrkGuaj0ud7MauCqEfH6pu7dQzenwJJ9HZWM=; b=QBslaD5YGXSKmi9uWpOVI7X2PWG28yx/OCk5MiDFymSQsTSJq3pvQrcOO7+hOCmowI wiwlU4CNCWa8Xdm2T7o4IQQsrUz71h/ayaQyN4BtA38IVTw9mAVfoZeRF1jNh1olrpTx kD7Ttx2Kt3n00o8NruoDyYgTyX41syltbQdwZ7LzrtSeezDYvgqm6r0TkuJYx2YEVdzE ZV87Fb5csR6eX+zDX3VUJXoN4SRCOSp3ALECtnKFiQGdRAZgkLVD6KcJgfVHf7DMTIKJ U7jqZiTGjnp+rPiyD76+39DaFb8Nc1TRQxcRjQWisdexqqgbF6Eoy0JE6LSgaLGATUVV 19tw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jt8mqsShK4yC2Z3EHZOyF1thH1vvxFSe70w7nfjDjFgo7UXbV auE1FLV39LNWoqiyWS7PdFbJDJjJLRh1OA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzur74iE9fCZ4gAMC58od9cur7BUaQjUxym+R/6qFwVR/nAOXFc9OQXlj2Im2ejOpTRWkjRwg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec03:b029:d7:c7c2:145a with SMTP id l3-20020a170902ec03b02900d7c7c2145amr6145825pld.33.1607124891992; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:34:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-42-33.volcanocom.com. [107.182.42.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j69sm5915973pfd.37.2020.12.04.15.34.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:34:51 -0800 (PST)
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <134860ee-5fbf-2fb3-a5b3-4be68806ab22@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6veBqY1fUuoy3Qm=vfrV51_5YyoS0P4SLSbKJP_Qrcn-A@mail.gmail.com> <7224575d-685f-5020-073e-c1880acecc88@mtcc.com> <7e459496-61f8-ddcd-713c-3b6be448090c@gmail.com> <2cecceac-1add-44ec-6e16-e157fee293fe@mtcc.com> <5a577765-4a0d-e1bf-5321-dfeff19d107e@gmail.com> <40d7e78e-7026-c65c-383c-df4e3c537de3@mtcc.com> <6fae9ca6-d8ea-1d62-4156-249191029cc3@gmail.com> <80f9963e-20bf-cdfe-cf3b-cda7b2ed08ab@mtcc.com> <CAOZAAfPbKv-9w9aZhyYUsKkEtR2W90O3JuCfB3pe60qOWtT_zg@mail.gmail.com> <c0ee5678-822c-40b3-9072-e6a4c350f34e@mtcc.com> <6dea9912-83fd-b981-adca-4e6c81047b92@gmail.com> <a5e1a7c1-54a2-232d-3356-d9be0bf20f18@mtcc.com> <0628c73b-be8f-8baa-cbed-4e8fbdc443a8@gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <c829f429-a921-131a-9b3e-b4fdba7392b8@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:34:49 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0628c73b-be8f-8baa-cbed-4e8fbdc443a8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Ha-xEuxJRBk4j0zHkc1lXbad1sM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 23:34:54 -0000

On 12/4/20 3:30 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 12/4/2020 3:27 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> A bunch of non-responsive responses. If you didn't feel like 
>> answering the question asked you could have just kept scrolling. I 
>> didn't ask for pointers, after all. 
>
> The pointers are answers.  If you don't feel like reading the material 
> or reflecting on it, that's a different matter.
>
There was nothing to "reflect" with the history pointer. It was 
completely non-responsive. If your intention is not to answer the 
question, what is your motivation keeping this non-responsive thread 
alive for a dozen messages?

Mike