Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 04 December 2020 23:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94BC3A104C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:42:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2fq9cnc-Lwgz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:42:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0137B3A104B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id l23so4090225pjg.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:42:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=HW/By+1tQXwsElU3bjJgULz/w2SCcVTFfECv/WeZI5w=; b=VBYLIdl6hyV6KNy543yBdc88wL7tqUbeGvif3ybebDPfI0rCOEOhOw5XWejUlEsaO7 zPKpPPpmna7eLtBq0Nab9oNVWWb2bHV09eRpBGs/RltA90F/vbECXU9DVtbLkYsypFbG EoEMF53lkJs8tLTjbDucnC4bkFBhTREuPadpmKujRIiuHlIxLjykhK8HZNUXiEa8zRNT yywg3ww5lE4OiBqOAP+mCcouGHQmw+qzXsgmYYR6DW27OV8iQ+T0TW3yrzjOW0gSpvAM CKQrxQMmFVTsYthVVxi0s/Fd07M7Dz0io5sQq5ert44ntdWt9NSbbAo8tQCsBNXxuY+h HunQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=HW/By+1tQXwsElU3bjJgULz/w2SCcVTFfECv/WeZI5w=; b=aC82YYkf3Zc/O3H5jBV8l8aUMq+gMjNfs8tcaxuXO6N5ZYo20aHcJnBRQzIWFk8e5+ Ut2rb7cKl8tXD4AEvFCtC9IXR883VT7ZUJOIML9+Vwvx0P/iQOuAuDNGUDHuJSrZmeD3 7ph3A+iJvd51M/SNMU8FVDJnQPoU0vwAvjyy6tRUtoMPTCJSIScZFlkEEHN3PUEhZj6m kxivM3NZlCGGeeU8M5jx2RhYHror5xNhxiS7BaiXlNouRCt3J7rJVTawZHdrC8Tuv2jd xwSrGA7PVOw+XZGwVi97mOdzKNksoCvPQW5HkYLONcl+Y5A+HAKDJooAyvljbsoOQI9V GTSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Pt6FivUUOXRFmPVOmUbA8swazG2FuuehZl1NxhOmgQrB9QsB8 J2nvV5ILhiu3wrLB/t7udhwUoXCpgKE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0eED9jaPXgMjZWtJNPi8eVh77DvCicTmzIlgq+FlyTAy4PQmINMs6JWRcYCyhVmeFpZhBSA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8406:: with SMTP id j6mr6210110pjn.183.1607125352426; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19sm5018300pgk.86.2020.12.04.15.42.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:42:31 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <134860ee-5fbf-2fb3-a5b3-4be68806ab22@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6veBqY1fUuoy3Qm=vfrV51_5YyoS0P4SLSbKJP_Qrcn-A@mail.gmail.com> <7224575d-685f-5020-073e-c1880acecc88@mtcc.com> <7e459496-61f8-ddcd-713c-3b6be448090c@gmail.com> <2cecceac-1add-44ec-6e16-e157fee293fe@mtcc.com> <5a577765-4a0d-e1bf-5321-dfeff19d107e@gmail.com> <40d7e78e-7026-c65c-383c-df4e3c537de3@mtcc.com> <6fae9ca6-d8ea-1d62-4156-249191029cc3@gmail.com> <80f9963e-20bf-cdfe-cf3b-cda7b2ed08ab@mtcc.com> <CAOZAAfPbKv-9w9aZhyYUsKkEtR2W90O3JuCfB3pe60qOWtT_zg@mail.gmail.com> <c0ee5678-822c-40b3-9072-e6a4c350f34e@mtcc.com> <6dea9912-83fd-b981-adca-4e6c81047b92@gmail.com> <a5e1a7c1-54a2-232d-3356-d9be0bf20f18@mtcc.com> <0628c73b-be8f-8baa-cbed-4e8fbdc443a8@gmail.com> <c829f429-a921-131a-9b3e-b4fdba7392b8@mtcc.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cdd0f41b-0b8a-720e-501e-5565113c095e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:42:30 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c829f429-a921-131a-9b3e-b4fdba7392b8@mtcc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------AA0AE1A12800E857CF15A32C"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/icKvytD1cRJkD3YQkwah99WQgcA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 23:42:35 -0000

On 12/4/2020 3:34 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>>
>> The pointers are answers.  If you don't feel like reading the 
>> material or reflecting on it, that's a different matter.
>>
> There was nothing to "reflect" with the history pointer. It was 
> completely non-responsive.

It was completely responsive.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org