Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 04 December 2020 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2403A0FF8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:01:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lZWBNZCXTqXM for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:01:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70353A0FF9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:01:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id e5so4016109pjt.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:01:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=gr2inke//CkLOi0eboie5KKPRRWe8jojMhrFK1Gke24=; b=sbYUv7KpUdFJNy/GaOH6FTj/oY/MlVWSSG0FwQsZQVObLj9K/5568yv7Gsn5r3Q67K 6whyEqgRDdfCQcvigZa51jenmraryq/b/gcpp938xXyCEzU0NI4m8kntJiUHV5RlM6tG DYT1D79r+ZqNxmfK7HMt3SyUpAkwTl+eqZdxJD3thRaZ4Nyn0Ij1CxNKHTpIaArr70Lx 3iqzbry056BMAA1LWiRoPYGVfBth9g/Z4RgqdA+kYqD9qd4b63Rh72wCRRd91BNDjLnk hubFmKEqTi8xU2QdAZVin2Zj6niuS0d5TvzQLg5Q/uuCn/z0TwWmbI1j38WzITMAXC7M +7PA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=gr2inke//CkLOi0eboie5KKPRRWe8jojMhrFK1Gke24=; b=ZalfRpAinzghJ88S0J+7izdkYLN6t4XKHnFnxhOcbqxEIIoGrGg5p8YCPBF6MqXVqC TDQLVVj5aoNRAykDhkqWDABsxs9W8s6+8XswOJQln/Z9gHvip7o292pBzo0NDc2PO+BB 9hrValnDF+TybEzy/QBFEUGDPo0vLb1a8glYXqrAkAVo41ZOaj7ox50IbcCxXUvWfL+P B4ssVAEb4e0637+kMymQmzwBlvaWFldlSUJnixySPM64+leQI/rRue2DGepUpUf03UT+ bpgFlqgj2QXeN+O9L9GSyqGG5ktB/IE1LSqDgbf6yna+Apb9fabu2EamrsecbTSR/zwn in+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mCtW1IqrTLsTRQfAbNkpDI5q8bFQ264m1a4hjDlgPjcah15Ca q/v2c6QEcVNEjRi3Hj53jNW9LFf5nF/yMA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwuMO5gIyVZYCJ0MUT5/3472GrqwV4LV3mfqD5zmPIgSZZCSxcUTnZBqTpvlo9Etxtz4xNYXA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7e85:b029:da:726a:3a4f with SMTP id z5-20020a1709027e85b02900da726a3a4fmr5833391pla.65.1607122893880; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:01:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-42-33.volcanocom.com. [107.182.42.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 77sm5978639pfv.16.2020.12.04.15.01.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:01:33 -0800 (PST)
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <134860ee-5fbf-2fb3-a5b3-4be68806ab22@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6veBqY1fUuoy3Qm=vfrV51_5YyoS0P4SLSbKJP_Qrcn-A@mail.gmail.com> <7224575d-685f-5020-073e-c1880acecc88@mtcc.com> <7e459496-61f8-ddcd-713c-3b6be448090c@gmail.com> <2cecceac-1add-44ec-6e16-e157fee293fe@mtcc.com> <5a577765-4a0d-e1bf-5321-dfeff19d107e@gmail.com> <40d7e78e-7026-c65c-383c-df4e3c537de3@mtcc.com> <6fae9ca6-d8ea-1d62-4156-249191029cc3@gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <80f9963e-20bf-cdfe-cf3b-cda7b2ed08ab@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:01:31 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6fae9ca6-d8ea-1d62-4156-249191029cc3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B8F889DF376A45F262747DE3"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/qVtIktBRbgMjt7Slix1I4v2Dt8c>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 23:01:36 -0000

On 12/4/20 2:59 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 12/4/2020 2:51 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/documents/
>>>
>> What changed in the bis version to change its intended status? 
>
> There is a 'History' button to click on that page, to answer that 
> question.
>
2020-11-11
	00 	Todd Herr 	New version available: *draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt*
2020-11-11
	00 	(System) 	Forced post of submission
2020-11-11
	00 	Todd Herr 	Set submitter to ""Todd M. Herr" 
<todd.herr@valimail.com>"m>", replaces to (none) and sent approval email to 
group chairs: dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
2020-11-11
	00 	Todd Herr 	Uploaded new revision


is responsive to my question in what way?

Mike