Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Mon, 23 November 2020 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B06F3A0BB0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:00:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6C2Fq3Yxze_5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728D13A0BA0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 81so15675158pgf.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:00:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=9HmyM0Y1Jyi3eDDQz22wx+xgeL5x1xkpZTqaRn1rcvw=; b=vTEhJF8Ne9Hk9LmolGuC/6la1sn3+tz5FMgydSrI5qbRBy16NXStsc5ENwoxAyR68g 9LmjZhwE72KjeoJEdWRxgK+YsriY7ubQsNVxhZQNYU40wTYHjt/b8mJYbRtP+NJlXyHh sN5gZXvOv0a9uOyp4MiQr+xx/mU4bCiKUG72L09jnbSeRw6et+S0v9SKAomnDfSUwHfG FAHSq6JLhazrCt8zrlW3GyzHxw01Pc+jIgblEYNEKMuulB0OaRp2w8CVQXw18/twwYXy L6RsMoIVIMYtccL7D8U1s37W46Cpe+sI7HAG6NcirYYxtrn0xhblL9fSedqu8iQmAUwP mYVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=9HmyM0Y1Jyi3eDDQz22wx+xgeL5x1xkpZTqaRn1rcvw=; b=VUQ8BaCVaEUgOCd6b5fhaDZuJ3hlWFtzMjyGJnGIl9hxCJFrUsDcotJ+CeUEExslWj JFi+1kIOWcsz5tu3wNplD+85MKV6oakHT0TviMSwy0W6vxPYRNyXxrqLQCkDOoaWp2AJ q4RQtYNmuCSu6VRQ3zKRrEFgSIttI9qhTgBSOWwbDG2E1Q3RrjE0xjhI3GUYIwyhMFfl 41VX5pekJIhdpxNxWdi9zvUZsVnEXv+Q1Qy1MP1v1piWV9NtZFs1fAp0RaSwxqwC9PAu l0FUEyfiJREZmZnbjUDgshglvqAiqDqmQ3URQ/iXvHVe4WkFeB//RYT2j/dRjRHg1ldI GZDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DgdSN+gfYy3hwL2xBVoHUchwSKWaPvwALr8mFZSZmxnPSY56R 7ocCKr0ALCepiEkDZ01t/cVvhVhtiHs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwE1F2QMWHRzhrLrZ8xmQdefVCg9Tht5d4rHcIAPY0OKbDebByNE0DH37JC1G/q0+eXdzfXew==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f0c7:: with SMTP id fa7mr1332203pjb.3.1606172449821; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l17sm423535pjy.29.2020.11.23.15.00.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:00:49 -0800 (PST)
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <dcc265f9-a143-5093-eba0-94ee059c7cc7@mtcc.com> <CAMSGcLCzN5q_p_TtUqv5CvwC0ZTkAY9eFaT_za-1WJXgRUmF4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8nN+827KB+tTuyoeZXoUaKzcYoeizNmwSY-fKTquroPMA@mail.gmail.com> <e3d428f4-1a29-4c6f-4a31-96a24a347e54@gmail.com> <rph9gd$2mp3$1@gal.iecc.com> <4a800bd1-0334-137b-ab71-b98cc1d038cc@gmail.com> <ec7eb8b4-71a5-166-6d4b-49829e1bbcb2@taugh.com> <5eabd3b5-601b-f3c5-1ffa-80e7a8c4e52b@gmail.com> <9b926abf-2f35-565c-c4fa-49be3fde64c1@taugh.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0f1055bd-ef55-2e0d-499a-d2295a4630e6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:00:47 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9b926abf-2f35-565c-c4fa-49be3fde64c1@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/WqTghNbAjOnbFC-NqekGKbP807k>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:00:52 -0000

On 11/23/2020 2:58 PM, John R Levine wrote:
>> And, again, when ARC work was pursued, I don't recall anyone claiming 
>> that mailing lists were (significant) sources of misbehavior.
> Well, OK.  Please feel free to provide footnoted documentation of what 
> the actual motivation for ARC was if you believe it was something else.


Typically, the burden of substantiating a claim falls on the person 
making the affirmative claim.


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org