Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 31 March 2021 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F813A287D for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_yAx2N-W6yl for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0265D3A287F for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 617A22812FF; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5B575281494; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E1C2812FF; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFF160911A0; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 421093FE9E; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:23:22 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:23:22 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210331132322.GB30138@nic.fr>
References: <CAMGpriX5rbswMQnjh4gZqsLjh2xUJxjJVxe2rEAVu=RdLAbGFw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOntrAqq_bVL-y-BP0DZLvYmVMkvKqi8K0D_SFqAfCVXg@mail.gmail.com> <96c2475d-ad93-a442-2003-db6f8782e450@cs.tcd.ie> <CAMGpriXdU7_mJh8CQvSiZGQaDUD9aZF=0iYu0yKBS06khAHgng@mail.gmail.com> <4094551f-4b39-a996-f12f-8c5317c4fe21@nic.cz> <20210331092449.GD10597@nic.fr> <cefd04bf-8685-1894-ef3a-b61ce6a37167@innovationslab.net> <155BAF8D-9F65-4C5C-9EB1-58EFD70827B5@rfc1035.com> <c1ae3401-2565-016b-7acc-4891d0bde067@cs.tcd.ie> <DEEF3D2D-695F-4FCE-BF2B-425BB9FF1F39@rfc1035.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <DEEF3D2D-695F-4FCE-BF2B-425BB9FF1F39@rfc1035.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.8
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-14-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.4.9.2830568, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2021.3.31.131216, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.82.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2021.3.31.5820001
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/6EnUFFgCMbOR6l7b78VrrM3JuPY>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:23:54 -0000

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 02:12:03PM +0100,
 Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote 
 a message of 15 lines which said:

> But the WG doesn’t seem to want to consider that.

But what DPRIVE could do here? RFC 8806 is published. Besides sending
its successor on the standards track, what do you suggest the group to
do?