Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Wed, 31 March 2021 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CC13A364C for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y_2XESdSz-vM for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pch.net (keriomail.pch.net [206.220.231.84]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 297413A364F for <dprive@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Footer: cGNoLm5ldA==
Received: from [10.19.48.7] ([69.166.14.2]) by mail.pch.net (Kerio Connect 9.2.7 patch 3) with ESMTPS (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:29:26 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Message-Id: <2607D274-936F-4A31-9E4D-EEBCF45BE838@pch.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D40D7DEE-6454-48BB-81BC-1C5EDD33A2B1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:29:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SxPNVAZMYfZqF+K6Xf8FPGa9ZgHkL-uUvtKMEiJSPmp8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
References: <c925da9089fa4b1e991ec74fc9c11e7f@verisign.com> <CAChr6Sxwao=FAcoeHMuOf0L=JCZ+wvhsr9BNZW_dbt+1=HWQwg@mail.gmail.com> <20210331091238.GA10597@nic.fr> <CAChr6SxPNVAZMYfZqF+K6Xf8FPGa9ZgHkL-uUvtKMEiJSPmp8Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/nrNhWCo38D0s5iOtIodaj2CmSdk>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:29:42 -0000


> On Mar 31, 2021, at 9:55 PM, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still don't understand the resistance here. Some data on what the impact would be still seems like the most helpful thing to move the conversation forward.

We have that:

https://vaibhavbajpai.com/documents/papers/proceedings/dot-pam-2021.pdf

Short story is that it’s 3x - 15x higher load on the servers, more delay, fewer people served, easier DDoS.

That’s a price that can be paid, if there’s a suitably corresponding benefit, and no more effective way to solve the problem.

Could you state the problem that’s being solved?

                               -Bill