IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 01 April 2021 05:52 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924CE3A1227 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9gIerXEgTFNd for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1D643A1179 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id v26so991882iox.11 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SlC3H5OFbgZ/rAu6Sf24D6t3WpCvZZHf/iQJLHF6Ksk=; b=ey6vzigPI9qLj/kAwLHg3RxmMvrI01nJsvg5MkX8XHo01734Tuy853+XMEDoiOscUQ Y5OPmWMJG207cchAXnjxZSYoYtbRJyKsBtPxSjCQ6OI8ZOFg5tQ4GsxFnE0I2IvjS5kk uf3hcSURS80a9joiOd112BJW//snFc1ch1SUHhEBu9tz8wO3fzFk3UqsZa+QPyVwnVfx JUh4iRkmg/tu9AnJIjDL/YzmUvmsNt8M6+IowTp+xNI4aHgJNTYpBrFieuwbL0LgiOsu KfbO/ISE9+tlkHrB+FXKrYggziaItJARXGbBnn2YFKVUJKYvzBmFRS3Jeixpq3vkDtYd 3Xdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SlC3H5OFbgZ/rAu6Sf24D6t3WpCvZZHf/iQJLHF6Ksk=; b=POuX6BuURkj/FSda7+ycfVaMELLdZ3jQsQz4AeyUmoCHnJ7ZkXM3cFA2YJ9KHlvlkQ RV3v3d7O+xch8Q7SdeA6XoJy/3RGP7fhW1vjnh+kcCfLovRJhRBz1Q6Uoefa5nVhsYL7 A4+NNtP6TR7GWzW08spNTqW2o8zaH76M3FsXiJPcdhi0eEnxGn5bibxA9r9hma/h9Nzx p9XgJGU1ToacbmnaX6HgOs7sl3X3AJVH6XGAbU3JiGhRFLzYHRc0buc43o+h2ChN+BF9 53Q1rvVfrNn9IYJlkvKm+ayG4rtl3Zd31xsfgLkZ5Sfyp7OwY9O+zS/snapEP8Vp3bvd HyAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dMhtMoRQe2YvmuuIFT6hf/EB6tZzQmSbxwZhPUXspcMfs516n Yp5loddOgt7nTK/ZTdCcmHrYpOTQw+mbW1d4iAxS8PumM9nlHQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSPHuOlNWCWXUcj6hpkoazu9vDupuLs8om9rHMJwJMHAjTulx6WsFwMgmFBZLiCtrGVhk9RHngVpTDMFLVbvw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:89d9:: with SMTP id a25mr5307675iot.69.1617256321892; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <c925da9089fa4b1e991ec74fc9c11e7f@verisign.com> <CAChr6Sxwao=FAcoeHMuOf0L=JCZ+wvhsr9BNZW_dbt+1=HWQwg@mail.gmail.com> <20210331091238.GA10597@nic.fr> <CAChr6SxPNVAZMYfZqF+K6Xf8FPGa9ZgHkL-uUvtKMEiJSPmp8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2607D274-936F-4A31-9E4D-EEBCF45BE838@pch.net> <CAChr6Szg+EbFqSpFPco8Gyb9pzNNnrSoQJcXTDVeg40_EXiPDg@mail.gmail.com> <4B1CCB51-C777-4434-B28E-76C22C12E4DA@pch.net> <ccd66dc4-b58e-917b-2d5f-6e732b5add65@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <ccd66dc4-b58e-917b-2d5f-6e732b5add65@huitema.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:51:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxmEX77K29Td_JqGgOb+RnxEYD5B=AysFnqQZEBmzerbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>, "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000093ca5605bee2d488"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/di5Oi3LbWUw7o8duxFVAF3J_9OI>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 05:52:09 -0000

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:43 PM Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
wrote:

> I think that's the big motivation behind DoQ. Because QUIC runs over UDP,
> it makes some things easier than TCP. In particular, I have seen (and done)
> demos of supporting 50,000 QUIC connections over a single UDP socket, which
> is definitely easier on the system than trying to support parallel wait on
> 50,000 TCP sockets. But this is a motivation to do work on the subject, not
> a recommendation to change the way root servers operate. I personally agree
> with the statement that root servers should not rush to implement, but
> rather wait and see until the technology matures.
>

I don't know... shouldn't they start work now?

I wonder if root server capex costs have gone down 41% since this post:
https://blog.verisign.com/domain-names/chromiums-reduction-of-root-dns-traffic/

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email