Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 31 March 2021 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9B93A2705 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=innovationslab-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUO8esW_UrMY for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf32.google.com (mail-qv1-xf32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD273A270B for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf32.google.com with SMTP id c3so8646384qvz.7 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=innovationslab-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=5Ybb1SECb6Ti1/325VuOkNEZTYHECmtJVkILMPXKK80=; b=sDpne4ziF/lYTTGphw/Kg35h9lfCaGuWECuK/eR/4mRLx4b4g9kfoFwlimbTPbYCx3 fR31E9dF0BFTs5I5lQYbeXNucNZhtkjqq8DmqYiI5wCIQkSfXwOeksVHRl1AwSLG4suA Hp0Lu2ar+8VsxFx1qA24DJs+CTloAfb2GCNZl8rNOjNvkwP2P8k+S6THuDTLwnYoErkZ KWiyo3Qjdxqgzu3YF2zaTU32QdNo3tPJ20r+qC7fIESOxIJS+voomRcVnxuNxzWjBqSn uuWMPJnBPerbpb1cp1nk1eQL7rcfiW4Y03gtri5QYkozI7H2AqJT4utOHMG+MmfUWaAL RddA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5Ybb1SECb6Ti1/325VuOkNEZTYHECmtJVkILMPXKK80=; b=qQP9cvAT34PY25TKD2YI8vLhWw1t13Jae0P8RMzUHmykcfSrkqMUDP+G4bZ4V5JEER HP6oZo06LR+C8qMsJVox3ozI2KYCG+v43aBkui0L/RBacKxg1N7y0izxmekAWfoOEUzu yNMhXIin8iOwVkyA8n1z/Ct5lnjxjWqpW2GpBxaNyTGMJ6TvOJFX/OjnbpFAt4RU9ssr gq2I9senp9BzsbCYXzFMKwJ6ztWaxnJgcElBEFrGx9OXdYeo2BJVJu6Y5suAf/QPhzcj 1/fYGTdKP99fs3ZRRaxApZLCt0E3Ued2BRBk6uJmEuMsVTup84X9tsYOVz/7Jk3KN3CI w+mA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oel4S5L/3GfIx/KugSR5+M277rpbfUKhPw3qh6AzFjorjewIU atxbwJfStRi66nLOys/BgK5buQPN2wd2kaEl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyH+VigvTuhyJLSwTLB2kVyaMqM7kFyzx8r6/JTClLExwEAPd3A4idy1l37bUlc8AJipC3XiQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:51c1:: with SMTP id p1mr2786161qvq.39.1617194041156; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local ([2601:5ce:300:84e:fd6a:d664:b700:96d5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14sm1269294qkx.112.2021.03.31.05.33.59 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
References: <c925da9089fa4b1e991ec74fc9c11e7f@verisign.com> <CAChr6Sxwao=FAcoeHMuOf0L=JCZ+wvhsr9BNZW_dbt+1=HWQwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriX5rbswMQnjh4gZqsLjh2xUJxjJVxe2rEAVu=RdLAbGFw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOntrAqq_bVL-y-BP0DZLvYmVMkvKqi8K0D_SFqAfCVXg@mail.gmail.com> <96c2475d-ad93-a442-2003-db6f8782e450@cs.tcd.ie> <CAMGpriXdU7_mJh8CQvSiZGQaDUD9aZF=0iYu0yKBS06khAHgng@mail.gmail.com> <4094551f-4b39-a996-f12f-8c5317c4fe21@nic.cz> <20210331092449.GD10597@nic.fr>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <cefd04bf-8685-1894-ef3a-b61ce6a37167@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:33:58 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210331092449.GD10597@nic.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FNQDwyDJ2k4MyXUwdn7y6gKjuFei8Suu8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/_HKGICrCfyGFy_H7JdNW8mMrqh0>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:34:33 -0000


On 3/31/21 5:24 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:44:08AM +0200,
>  Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> wrote 
>  a message of 12 lines which said:
> 
>> it's not so difficult to completely avoid querying root servers,
>> through one of the "local root" approaches.
> 
> RFC 8806 does not seem mentioned in the statement. Does anyone know
> why? 

I was wondering the same thing. 8806 would definitely preclude the need
to support encryption at the root.

Brian