Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 31 March 2021 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265583A109F for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EUdYCZRAhYig for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C96C83A109D for <dprive@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id w2so15375179ilj.12 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZJlDR3nx35QJZwuBTq2KuqKeWJhkCc2js3XWxbwrYb0=; b=DOmyWYLbWEFzWwcYLIio3gGeJuBOrxIWjyKUCObO1iwqpkpvsyLb31Cj9lztLutylm kcWqaqygQAYh7XrfBgoaVjDrFp3SezAgl/BmEE4bRlIqFLygs6a1WJj8Cj3CAUe9K/sE ZxV7gIUXyaNCM8nbzpwdkc3W5KT8/sI1aQ7+AR2w0xbrB2BXwh+k5FxECzGThY1gynHW xX/IxrXu0EB26jIQSCFFDCr2spiT6SCkzPyslc9ULZ6v/Q6XyT6cTwLx+vgKQq8Rijjn f0Nuqkp7JdahwvA8SQtX0Wj6hiEzdk+wgXVO7cUK5NXwh68WvIslIoqw4aJ2dysYo7N/ iR7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZJlDR3nx35QJZwuBTq2KuqKeWJhkCc2js3XWxbwrYb0=; b=RiP9Efxt67unmLDAUilsq7xHbgPuqyiF/3uhQEh0XaMY+/Oimj2de+Si23EU8SywKS RzmNW0mqK14jwAQKwzvjlx2XKGuRS28Vlu/GwWlF3rI2/uDKV7hTkIqTTiYivM0BE70G 4DyDkEZtAc1awLBglmH+kiTxwstxA8GMdbpeQDF2a7/PC6fvXmPSuOXNFJ5TjL4O+i/m TSfsfjdHuw6LQ/MrvlRo871nrj016zQPYIIIiet64MJrxS2kH+967qO+NaBgirvLwUQl l2i571ynz3hufHDx54DvP0OSenkHjexXjR2o8vNj7eYuugBg7t/ypIQ43efdhSD2OLTR tmyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530cwx8AZKTYSZrJO915jgalGaoD+V4twQo1Katyo/wo+cWbSE9b UTybYOW6eX+PsFgMitsrScWgk057Flg20iUm7Wk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywwl03Gj60v3p99qk/U6Wwgl2Fnnq7w6Z24OfGmgyPhfx5SA+4buH7isFsXjXpd8xqWwIbrYhe+tYmWMqMO3I=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d68c:: with SMTP id p12mr884318iln.73.1617155779968; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <c925da9089fa4b1e991ec74fc9c11e7f@verisign.com> <CAChr6Sxwao=FAcoeHMuOf0L=JCZ+wvhsr9BNZW_dbt+1=HWQwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriX5rbswMQnjh4gZqsLjh2xUJxjJVxe2rEAVu=RdLAbGFw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOntrAqq_bVL-y-BP0DZLvYmVMkvKqi8K0D_SFqAfCVXg@mail.gmail.com> <96c2475d-ad93-a442-2003-db6f8782e450@cs.tcd.ie> <CAMGpriXdU7_mJh8CQvSiZGQaDUD9aZF=0iYu0yKBS06khAHgng@mail.gmail.com> <d531d35c-0fd0-552d-6fb0-d01840053b10@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <d531d35c-0fd0-552d-6fb0-d01840053b10@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:56:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sy5s5QcsWismSnbRTcaOBV3HZjBVrWduMvQLpG7jqMUkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cfc3f005becb6bef"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/bGFLgpNrQNBf3QF6NRom6LWoOkM>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 01:56:26 -0000

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:36 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Also fair. Requiring the parent to be involved is a big deal
> for any of the offered solutions here (regardless of whether
> or not DNSSEC is involved).
>

I don't think anyone expects any high-traffic piece of DNS infrastructure
to just flip a switch and enable TLS or equivalent.

But, I also think it's increasingly untenable to claim a server can serve
traffic at all, unless it can support TLS 1.3 or something similar.

thanks,
Rob