Re: [dnsext] draft-vandergaast-edns-client-ip-00.txt

Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org> Tue, 02 February 2010 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB383A6810; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:12:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vkPU1usogqQ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:12:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B7E3A6857; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NcME9-000IAq-4q for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:07:49 +0000
Received: from [209.85.216.204] (helo=mail-px0-f204.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <matthew@dempsky.org>) id 1NcME5-000IAJ-Nj for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:07:45 +0000
Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so489185pxi.5 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:07:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.87.9 with SMTP id k9mr1175466wab.6.1265130464189; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:07:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7B06A582-38E3-4387-BA16-932825A4A62B@rfc1035.com>
References: <7c31c8cc1001271556w4918093er6e94e07cb92c4dc4@mail.gmail.com> <74DFF61A-A8BB-4B46-A873-F2407C34C412@sackheads.org> <139D0D6A-5A31-4EE8-88B9-3CACE933187B@icsi.berkeley.edu> <6e04e83a1002010944q7abfabc6h892ce4cbb1bddcbf@mail.gmail.com> <973B1F15-E822-491E-89BF-F09FC7E67509@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002011109u1cd55c99k8b584648184cdc73@mail.gmail.com> <162E0DB1-EC86-4206-AB36-6FEFA786B24C@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002011402u395f599g74180d28fdbe5707@mail.gmail.com> <939BB577-FDBE-4573-9129-8CA29B0FB493@sackheads.org> <7B06A582-38E3-4387-BA16-932825A4A62B@rfc1035.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:07:44 -0800
Message-ID: <d791b8791002020907l542a8760k55a6d01b26d27f4a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-vandergaast-edns-client-ip-00.txt
From: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> [2] Authoritative servers who can't/won't speak this EDNS0 option. The draft
> does not specify how they should behave.

Again complaining that a draft doesn't specify how software not
following that draft should behave.

> Another Bad Idea in this draft is the concept of not using these extended
> queries to root and TLD servers. [Ironically, this is one place where
> "optimised" addresses in responses could be useful by directing resolvers to
> the nearest server for a referral.]

The stub resolver's IP address isn't useful when querying zones that
only return delegation responses.  That data is used by the recursive
resolver, not the stub, and authoritative servers already have the
recursive resolver's full IP address.