Re: [dnsext] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-vandergaast-edns-client-ip-00.txt

John Payne <john@sackheads.org> Tue, 02 February 2010 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB443A67AF; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:41:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rnZrpxhbvF8L; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:41:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97393A6919; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:40:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NcJmd-0008Fi-0b for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:31:15 +0000
Received: from [66.92.146.20] (helo=stora.ogud.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <namedroppers@stora.ogud.com>) id 1NcJmV-0008EV-4x for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:31:08 +0000
Received: from stora.ogud.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o12EV4HK008180 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:31:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from namedroppers@stora.ogud.com)
Received: (from namedroppers@localhost) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o12EV41J008179 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:31:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from namedroppers)
Received: from [140.186.190.103] (helo=haybaler.sackheads.org) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <prvs=9648dd330c=john@sackheads.org>) id 1Nc4QL-000L0K-Qr for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:07:14 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.sackheads.org [127.0.0.1]) by haybaler.sackheads.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6EC28607; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:07:12 -0500 (EST)
Authentication-Results: haybaler.sackheads.org; domainkeys=pass (testing) header.from=john@sackheads.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sackheads.org; s=haybaler; t=1265062032; bh=8ZnOI+ozpjFCV3w9ZT/LbTxvzBAPSklbdU+RkACjgQQ=; h=Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=ps7v/Bz3xuHnne15/lgXPCK8qYfDyNYEBOTEIiHNaCjSz3ov9XasIBzak+SmACDlV kwSfdbyJpeVCQlNAstPrc8jmQxoEedIzkaFcrjdr9dSSZ8JocMSs0fd4xC/7zXq3vZ cmwWK+AyZ+m6EBszTcGBG/HsZnVh/toWl6RKrdvw=
Received: from haybaler.sackheads.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (haybaler.sackheads.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lmb-Y+X-2K7i; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:07:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: by haybaler.sackheads.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 11FDB285FA; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:07:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [172.30.3.172] (unknown [72.246.0.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: john@sackheads.org) by haybaler.sackheads.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F67285D2; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:07:11 -0500 (EST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=haybaler; d=sackheads.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from: in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=KyQ9ItczkZLSWcsFIqrTrhOyQO3FYwLbzcityjbrralNxtGjRNhSYRxN2TO7p68jg IiCGfEedAJQgWwCHMse9w+8QFsJzP5Jtu3Q3oDC0it4HdZb5p+0oogSRTGYLu6Ge0rp YpDOoPucAAVcAIKUmBYQLUS5+w89amXIBugqycs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sackheads.org; s=haybaler; t=1265062031; bh=8ZnOI+ozpjFCV3w9ZT/LbTxvzBAPSklbdU+RkACjgQQ=; h=Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=YJUDX+J2cY131dpDqZ4R9CiwKPicrZYOJ8qc8hqyM0L2xXinL7vkt6tIhT+9S30A6 QdRenNS4BaXPm6Dm2jvmR2V8YWTmyeL4/Z+5jAtjDJk8MNP0tPg4sns7wDvqmR/ADP Vtky367XJwIOO2ErYyYKhgNUh2ZgrblNCXEQKwcU=
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-vandergaast-edns-client-ip-00.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
In-Reply-To: <6e04e83a1002011402u395f599g74180d28fdbe5707@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:07:11 -0500
Cc: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>, Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>, Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@google.com>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <939BB577-FDBE-4573-9129-8CA29B0FB493@sackheads.org>
References: <7c31c8cc1001271556w4918093er6e94e07cb92c4dc4@mail.gmail.com> <OF675CC47F.6FE1B342-ON802576BA.00453090-C12576BA.0047E04C@nominet.org.uk> <74DFF61A-A8BB-4B46-A873-F2407C34C412@sackheads.org> <139D0D6A-5A31-4EE8-88B9-3CACE933187B@icsi.berkeley.edu> <6e04e83a1002010944q7abfabc6h892ce4cbb1bddcbf@mail.gmail.com> <973B1F15-E822-491E-89BF-F09FC7E67509@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002011109u1cd55c99k8b584648184cdc73@mail.gmail.com> <162E0DB1-EC86-4206-AB36-6FEFA786B24C@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002011402u395f599g74180d28fdbe5707@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 66.92.146.20
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

[ Moderators note: Post was moderated, either because it was posted by
   a non-subscriber, or because it was over 20K.  
   With the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss and therefore 
   delete relevant posts by non-subscribers. 
   Please fix your subscription addresses. ]


On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> 
> Please re-read what I said.  I recognize the value of DNS-based localization,
> but there is still an 80/20 rule to it.  This adds complexity to parts of the
> system outside the authoritative systems that want to use these responses,
> and it is not clear that it is worth it from either a performance or privacy
> perspective.

Yes, it adds complexity to the recursive nameservers _that want to send the information_.

Where else is it adding any complexity?