Re: [dnsext] Re: Privacy vs EDNS Client IP...

Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org> Thu, 04 February 2010 05:41 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCA73A688E; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:41:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oM4askau-Mz7; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864983A67F2; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NcuQT-00044l-Il for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:38:49 +0000
Received: from [209.85.216.204] (helo=mail-px0-f204.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <matthew@dempsky.org>) id 1NcuQQ-00044L-Q6 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:38:46 +0000
Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so3402956pxi.5 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:38:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.187.12 with SMTP id k12mr440553waf.220.1265261925405; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:38:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100204053643.GA15309@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <6e04e83a1002011402u395f599g74180d28fdbe5707@mail.gmail.com> <6e04e83a1002011640t1b637e30gd7d0150eeb0fae8d@mail.gmail.com> <E9A13A5C-73A7-4F66-9617-482551A9BA84@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002021155kcb908b1v71d362e03e7c4002@mail.gmail.com> <AB78D628-8A01-4742-B32A-90FC6806201E@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <20100203031042.GE1374@vacation.karoshi.com.> <7c31c8cc1002030135w183db140vd1c638bbdc999800@mail.gmail.com> <20100204033342.GA13940@vacation.karoshi.com.> <d791b8791002032046l6b834294jdf0f00fa4d5d141f@mail.gmail.com> <20100204053643.GA15309@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:38:45 -0800
Message-ID: <d791b8791002032138j7d3e9761vb465c5283151c3d0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Re: Privacy vs EDNS Client IP...
From: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:36 PM,  <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
>        they don't have to be open...
>        the trick is, how does the hobo, migrant stub resolver
>        -know- that the sole-source IMR/cache that is offered
>        does or does -NOT- have this tracking collar on?

How does it know whether or not the cache is shipping all of its query
logs to the FBI/CIA right now?