IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] something for RFC2671-bis

Michael Graff <mgraff@isc.org> Tue, 02 February 2010 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C733A687F; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:25:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GlQzVBBLPorh; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E283A659B; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NcOKu-000JOp-0f for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:22:56 +0000
Received: from [2001:4f8:3:36::28] (helo=white.flame.org) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mgraff@isc.org>) id 1NcOKr-000JOM-UH for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:22:54 +0000
Received: from white.flame.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6648A17D1D6; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:22:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bigmac.home.flame.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff9:13:21d:4fff:fe47:6790]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 633C917D1D5; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:22:51 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4B687B8B.6090404@isc.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:51 -0600
From: Michael Graff <mgraff@isc.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
CC: Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@google.com>, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] something for RFC2671-bis
References: <7c31c8cc1001271556w4918093er6e94e07cb92c4dc4@mail.gmail.com> <6e04e83a1002010944q7abfabc6h892ce4cbb1bddcbf@mail.gmail.com> <973B1F15-E822-491E-89BF-F09FC7E67509@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002011109u1cd55c99k8b584648184cdc73@mail.gmail.com> <162E0DB1-EC86-4206-AB36-6FEFA786B24C@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002011402u395f599g74180d28fdbe5707@mail.gmail.com> <939BB577-FDBE-4573-9129-8CA29B0FB493@sackheads.org> <7B06A582-38E3-4387-BA16-932825A4A62B@rfc1035.com> <F2E927AA-B07C-45D0-9D26-AFE8115F2CC2@icsi.berkeley.edu> <B7A5F1C5-E972-4915-A90F-E561B041A133@rfc1035.com> <7c31c8cc1002021029m74d488ep9c2dc888dd1f93d0@mail.gmail.com> <37ECA1B1-F29D-4582-87E0-1D9AE32E0E3C@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <37ECA1B1-F29D-4582-87E0-1D9AE32E0E3C@rfc1035.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BE9E0FA6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2010-02-02 12:44 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
> Indeed. Perhaps this can be clarified if 2671bis gets revived. After all
> there is a difference between "I don't speak EDNS0" and "I don't
> understand this EDNS option". Until then, it would be prudent for anyone
> proposing new EDNS options to specify how implementatons that don't
> support the option should behave. Your mileage may vary.

I think it's critical for them to discuss what they think will happen to
existing clients.  At the least, it might detect operational problems
before they become widespread deployed problems.

- --Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAktoe4sACgkQ+NNi0s9NRJ0XpwCfV0Cub+HF2FT6cfPzyIsjjXqq
KH4AoKlLPMxiPCjbkFADNBMh2SynPFNW
=9i7+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email