IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 02 August 2022 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB45C1A6497 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 01:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9yvyNxNJp9p for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 01:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 779D9C15A731 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 01:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id uj29so11541322ejc.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 01:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DiA3b17/e9M5yGsOJxby/lS6r92QTVJpWqXNzTwIcH4=; b=oXX2+JRzBH59XXpvgC/4TrcJpDic/rvkK2YKk7HxyWF3rwVhmEPDRi4U/nmJ+nqoLW S+QvD90+zzb5bMBUFwK2VCzvrKWl9HXhQ15XmCcN97V/HgSDIoxAXjjAlKM+VgU487Fm dfUwwi0e6hC7EGvh7ehJX1PuUUnmlHMArcMWw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DiA3b17/e9M5yGsOJxby/lS6r92QTVJpWqXNzTwIcH4=; b=Lj1r/hldqf0YKHlnGbXCoOg4AVL1ReZRyUSfsfEYp9prhdoUjqmR/ZOudLZQzlSGa9 cwhyXX3oO+VOsHUMASKyRJjGbI/oxSb6XllyhqA5pmR+ZOGaTpbZKEgVDcBmxuti5GnM kZIiipAKT7ukf8x+JxZ/3uE5RUs7ta9aIfJzs4W18m3uZ459noXy3kB5nEywH4C2EVKm HjlPKzFJyNLZIzjWPiQDXlUlBom6PXf7o+Awi1Ak6cJcVba41XkbJHJoAtPnuAn+cjWW 0OV+kBIqPczsu9UGGyMKuMqz1XHL45I4zXmss6CsKYL++q5gZBLS7mP2eZOk7XBVqU74 XlKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9LFafCV7rVzmBAmkrr4r8R1i4b73BL91DSJwHbP1dZnsNqHjjt dTBsLOIxmHD7XmALzABATHYQ99kXD3XHGJFm+rI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tYSS/RI2kPK/yhQXFZ/eL5QafDV51Qi++hWmDS+9O0Kp1r9JTOfzgdrHTRG6oMO2H6OTDfZA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4fc3:b0:72e:eab4:d9d7 with SMTP id i3-20020a1709064fc300b0072eeab4d9d7mr15423764ejw.599.1659429339206; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 01:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-077-250-046-077.chello.nl. [77.250.46.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6-20020aa7ce06000000b0043ba24a26casm7960025edv.23.2022.08.02.01.35.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Aug 2022 01:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:35:37 +0200
Message-Id: <E390AC10-02E2-408B-84C0-2B93F49BBEC3@hopcount.ca>
References: <402f6c32-08bb-b046-64f6-2ebbb42abf70@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <402f6c32-08bb-b046-64f6-2ebbb42abf70@rfc-editor.org>
To: "Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19G71)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FW8Wj6fOBej5rVsgYMpPBcqnuqU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 08:35:45 -0000

On Aug 2, 2022, at 10:26, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> On 02.08.22 09:56, Joe Abley wrote:
>> 
>> If the position of the ISE is to ignore the prior discussion and publish one set of opinions regardless then perhaps it would be more straightforward just to say so.
> 
> Had I wanted to do so, I would not have approached dnsop in the first place.

Had you wanted to which? I'm confused.

By approaching dnsop in the first place with a box of freshly lit matches you seem precisely to be ignoring the prior discussion. 

If you don't intend to publish the drafts on your table then I don't understand what you're saying in the context of the hat you're wearing. 

Perhaps more fundamentally the idea of the ISE promoting work to be done in a working group apparently without the involvement of the chairs itself seems confusing. You know more about the job than I do, but in the past when I have published documents through the independent stream, the ISE's consultation was limited to an IESG conflict review.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email