Re: [DNSOP] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Tue, 02 August 2022 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7676C1BED31 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HRN6Rn1IIHM2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A2D4C1BED2F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id p71so3358480yba.9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 18:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=ni6LNJK7Gp8vj6mtNVd0HycuQDiJW9g/MXkaXc0CNXA=; b=8GBSZzDVnJP+G1ptftPdKbcF7hScig05ynexmAzm3L+799K8QMkvU8tioGc/6ia9Jh iH4XVWsAgBhnwpyaC3SIMpPJ9794VL09IynUsilfung9+32hcj/y0v0nxaHhxyhiH1mI vI7YAzq2yz3o9CJYoSFcHvvsspMRJuznr2gbqewjx1P3+/UhnqqX6qzvDylHUp21sinJ goJSJ/7X30UBHOYnzUPxqC505srNps000S93uviRKDvfMCZpsokcixcfmZ9WHEmHfG3D xI0WLMCnClsc8pDxBYPQBk32xvUqUyS0gehevohv5aS2Fm7iSEgkkhw9TKesYZixU6Mt V34g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=ni6LNJK7Gp8vj6mtNVd0HycuQDiJW9g/MXkaXc0CNXA=; b=vFYbZuVYckxmr1laglsAb1FlVW+vh/Fchsm/2rvMQRT+vrivcvIfyuCl8Q7yvrhkLh 3cJWTRYRWTGP1MIfg/lUrOv437kGfZ7onGhsJNoeX6Gx25K8Sp1utuAXgX7xoRV0eZ9V LkkL2EfYpCOHUBX9OeTWVq5xI2NLJHd9piQpS46ebPHVupxExY3fVxBriloFFO7/2FCm WcyWKraKIVJv2ev4l62P5kVzi7UI0z9AcnIpKv0PWLx5evc0SLHHGRHaiatSEWumaatd rehQcvUMpx6jmmiEri+KAN1biC+OpxceohazxmVVduehq10zm4CdFjgbgUfY7Hu90jTV 42Xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0ovAwZnrxB4TI6ioZ3WKvblnGNYl5EhOXB8Pgxpx0tH3TDtN3x ZxRyr5QHCBoJe5tseKttqa74dE77a+UHCsmiu28b3rOhPZo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7pDelDZWXpsYG/r7IUe8y5/KGn73+xJOop9UHievdJFZsm9ug1Cegb+0os2p01bVr4zbxsuRGw6SsuQ1/pkZs=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b50:0:b0:671:6606:fc8b with SMTP id 77-20020a250b50000000b006716606fc8bmr14011032ybl.241.1659405439661; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 18:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DC03052B-9EC4-4B9C-98FD-78124EED4801@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <DC03052B-9EC4-4B9C-98FD-78124EED4801@nohats.ca>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 11:57:08 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn1nGxvybdCh2_2Tf=CXiNTR0u5rtCf9Js97D-hFXtRzyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/WIKnwpA5_OqD-yoiW3CDOBK6xnE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 01:57:22 -0000

+1

This feels like a process run-around. The conversation has been held
in DNSOP and didn't reach consensus. It is not like the WG said "we
don't care" -the WG cared immensely. It just couldn't come to a single
point of view.

A lot of the issues are layer-8/9 and I think it's most likely this is
a sign of a problem which demands a different kind of document, not an
ISE document. Possibly its an IAB document about the view of the
integral namespace and process boundaries around delegation,
non-delegation and reservation as they intersect with protocol and
operations.

Also no-hats. I'm partisan in this, but I think the process question
is distinct from the actual topic

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 11:30 AM Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2022, at 08:31, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> >
>
> I do not think the ISE should ignore or be a workaround for RFC 6761 Special Use Domains. There any many problems with its application and its lack of application but adding the ISE as a third party along with the IETF and ICANN doesn’t make this problem easier.
>
> Alternate names spaces want a “real name”, so either their name or their mapping will  “squats” on the DNS namespace. They won’t use .alt or ._alt just like they aren’t using alt.onion or gns.onion.
>
> Paul (as individual)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop