IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 03 August 2022 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDA8C15A73B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bWWMtUa2z5Gh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa3.lax.icann.org (ppa3.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD5FC15A739 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa3.lax.icann.org (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 273EkNcM020941 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:46:23 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:46:22 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0986.026; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:46:22 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "Schanzenbach, Martin" <mschanzenbach@posteo.de>
CC: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] [Ext] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld
Thread-Index: AQHYpqvjEcIoxrcPP0yUB5CwO60jXq2dP3wAgAB4HIA=
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:46:22 +0000
Message-ID: <4D150F57-70E5-4210-BA1F-2E198C7FB34C@icann.org>
References: <91abb9ac-9d3b-87bf-5639-174581d625fd@rfc-editor.org> <5D598E6D-932F-4855-8D5F-C2DEDD20738C@icann.org> <20220802193440.2btqhcys6f3cqpwz@crankycanuck.ca> <1659470522-sup-5316@werkbank> <79B41983-E6C8-4F6F-A5BD-16F58B035068@posteo.de>
In-Reply-To: <79B41983-E6C8-4F6F-A5BD-16F58B035068@posteo.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B2A23CDF-DC8B-4B32-925B-4A83D8A3C9BE"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-03_03,2022-08-02_01,2022-06-22_01
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bZoN7MOSnARFVlVg-u3bhmug5AI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:46:28 -0000

On Aug 3, 2022, at 12:36 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin <mschanzenbach@posteo.de> wrote:
> 
> Having now read further I am pretty convinced that the advisory is not useful in the context of this thread discussion.
> Ist sais at the end that [1] was the "impetus" for the advisory.

Reading a five-year old version of a draft is not a good way to determine the current state of thinking. You should only be looking at the current version of the WG document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email