IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld

"Schanzenbach, Martin" <mschanzenbach@posteo.de> Wed, 03 August 2022 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mschanzenbach@posteo.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514FDC14F741 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TtfGxx3YCFhQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D27C15AE3C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A676E240103 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 17:09:21 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1659539362; bh=murbdYng0FAORVbz+s7RqvVb4mjJrhgba+zutahlwTU=; h=Subject:From:Date:Cc:To:From; b=nqK7t7fpSOFYVRAt7IA7TlmudeROY4CSgT8SKgxx3tSkMXESVlcAdznA3CsPn+fvv dtJtYMznpms4bLsumuBtVJrtuFGSjqF4xlQG9KISshQRc3+IP2LstWfz2kDwyjeCiE cehLsYWyx4dePNyEjlbt6tiejo3WVGKjRpMZ7gIGPR2CPzXlK6V14664W6xuNCHc2i 89dhK2DBoEEiAjxp90p+f5SVh/xRdqMFqmT5OrWl5D0khlwvwYXsreJzjpwgq5DH8l SBRu1BS0qCYSkckr65l8yHZHmPw6DrHuQIm4oRuLa7oib178fXND59OzPWpA7xOzST KWyvZcuEnAiKg==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4LyZyS3bDCz6tpZ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 17:09:20 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_87994EEA-9240-420B-9139-1720E51BC304"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: "Schanzenbach, Martin" <mschanzenbach@posteo.de>
In-Reply-To: <4D150F57-70E5-4210-BA1F-2E198C7FB34C@icann.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 15:09:15 +0000
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <37C1F77A-ACFF-4F12-A478-47BDACBB19B9@posteo.de>
References: <91abb9ac-9d3b-87bf-5639-174581d625fd@rfc-editor.org> <5D598E6D-932F-4855-8D5F-C2DEDD20738C@icann.org> <20220802193440.2btqhcys6f3cqpwz@crankycanuck.ca> <1659470522-sup-5316@werkbank> <79B41983-E6C8-4F6F-A5BD-16F58B035068@posteo.de> <4D150F57-70E5-4210-BA1F-2E198C7FB34C@icann.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kZmj6AfGF5IrONXzlyFVxT328W8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 15:10:47 -0000


> On 3. Aug 2022, at 16:46, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
> 
> On Aug 3, 2022, at 12:36 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin <mschanzenbach@posteo.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Having now read further I am pretty convinced that the advisory is not useful in the context of this thread discussion.
>> Ist sais at the end that [1] was the "impetus" for the advisory.
> 
> Reading a five-year old version of a draft is not a good way to determine the current state of thinking. You should only be looking at the current version of the WG document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/
> 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00
does not seem to be a predecessor of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/

On the contrary, the first references the second and confirms my analysis:

"
 The [I-D.ietf-dnsop-alt-tld] document reserves a string to be used as
   a pseudo-TLD for non-DNS resolution contexts.  However, it is clear
   that there is a significant use case for a similar string to be used
   for namespaces which are resolved using the DNS protocol, but which
   do not have a meaning in the global DNS context.
"

I do not understand what you are trying to tell me?

BR

> --Paul Hoffman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email