[DNSOP] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld

"Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 01 August 2022 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5CFC15BEC6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 05:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xA1ZiQv_o8L for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 05:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.227] (77-58-144-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.144.232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B9BDC157B5F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 05:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------VYR9hk8Gsr5VP83K0YTnVsHe"
Message-ID: <91abb9ac-9d3b-87bf-5639-174581d625fd@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 14:31:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Language: en-US
From: "Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tJW3H88aQqkRiohc3jSBFNGWjJs>
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-schanzen-gns and draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:31:51 -0000

Hello from your friendly neighborhood independent submissions editor.

It is indeed the case that draft-schanzen-gns is in conflict review.  It 
is also the case that Warren and I have been discussing that review.  
Obviously there are some concerns.  On the one hand, we need to find a 
way for people to explore alternative namespaces that look a bit like 
domain names.  On the other hand, we don't want to create problems with 
user expectations.  draft-ietf-dns-alt-tld seems like a reasonable means 
to bridge these concerns.

The ISE is willing to wait a reasonable period of time for this work to 
conclude.   It seems that you are close to done.  I know that this draft 
doesn't solve *all* namespace research problems by any stretch, but it 
will make life easier for at least SOME researchers, not to mention me.

Whether that means using TLD labels that begin with _ or whether that 
means suffixing them with ".ALT", I leave to you experts to sort.  I do 
agree with Martin that it would be helpful to have some registration of 
names so that conflicts between name spaces can be avoided.  This would 
also encourage formal documentation of those projects.

Thanks!

Eliot (ISE)