Re: [Ecrit] country specific emergency URNs

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 13 July 2017 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2BD129B29 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 23:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6P66o13-7-U7 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 23:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 925CC1201FA for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 23:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-81bff70000001b2f-53-596715665ab8
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.87]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0C.E8.06959.66517695; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:38:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB109.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.98]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:38:30 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
CC: "Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)" <keith.drage@nokia.com>, "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] country specific emergency URNs
Thread-Index: AdL2ROp+GC2FwlYiRHWp8QRnly9MhQARnPOAAEAq5AAAHB2PAAALhiIAAEj9T4AABsHgAAApl6CAAAYxyIAABIinAAASdB6AAB+YDYAAAFpNgAACM2oAAAEe2YAAADY9gAAA1MqAAAvCePD//+a/gIAA5aQA
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:38:29 +0000
Message-ID: <D58CED5D.1F468%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <52809D5B0606C049903AD6AD07E033E10326EF8FFD@ATWIREMXSC0101.sv.ad.tmo> <AF1BEB84-A0D2-44AD-9666-1C608B73BC68@brianrosen.net> <CACgrgBbgMqWn3ovUogw6o_pLPhJBpSOPZ+JgDcSfgzzChcUcAQ@mail.gmail.com> <DB5PR07MB14806FA9F5D0FA90DEF2E1E2F7AB0@DB5PR07MB1480.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CACgrgBY1Y_cT_F-eT-R50H81o5=9xgTjdLgRKS2x59Ar0M4gxw@mail.gmail.com> <52809D5B0606C049903AD6AD07E033E10327096BB1@ATWIREMXSC0101.sv.ad.tmo> <CACgrgBazRYu_XAu2S1t5-mEoMPYmRVFG+az71LLej_wTVFTiqw@mail.gmail.com> <52809D5B0606C049903AD6AD07E033E1032709747D@ATWIREMXSC0101.sv.ad.tmo> <CACgrgBYUs=CfyjuPM9BX9Z1u9o7Boqtpj4=viOMB0VjYu0Aq9w@mail.gmail.com> <52809D5B0606C049903AD6AD07E033E1032709783F@ATWIREMXSC0101.sv.ad.tmo> <CACgrgBY+d==tTbVCuwLcTP_M6saYZw0UpV4Mi66DL2ToCbVeeA@mail.gmail.com> <52809D5B0606C049903AD6AD07E033E10327178504@ATWIREMXSC0101.sv.ad.tmo> <1599E1B5-CBA4-43F9-90FC-FA8D4EBAC28F@brianrosen.net> <52809D5B0606C049903AD6AD07E033E103271785EB@ATWIREMXSC0101.sv.ad.tmo> <ED1B93BE-A29D-46F5-8417-C8D56C9F83C5@brianrosen.net> <DB5PR07MB14809D599D828F1A5420CD34F7AF0@DB5PR07MB1480.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <1FFAF3E4-3FCF-43A9-8194-AA4B337FFFE2@brianrosen.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CC600F4@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <3ABCE27C-CC6F-47AF-AD69-4AD38F3B55DE@brianrosen.net>
In-Reply-To: <3ABCE27C-CC6F-47AF-AD69-4AD38F3B55DE@brianrosen.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.4.170508
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <0EA068256B713E46A3CE33191EF78DE8@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7uG6aaHqkwdt9FhZP709js2hc9JTV YsOW4ywOzB73v/1l91iy5CeTx91bl5gCmKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MrY3tLEUrBCqeLy5lb2B 8QhfFyMnh4SAicTf5VOZuhi5OIQEjjBKfP34jR3CWcwosfhwE1CGg4NNwEKi+582SIOIgLLE zlud7CA2s0CMxI9jd9lASoSBBjV3iUGUmEq8aHnBCjJGRGAVo8TxWceYQBIsAqoSExd0soHY vALWEl9un2CG2DWPS2Jv8zZWkASngJPEwpUPwYoYBcQkvp9awwSxTFzi1pP5TBBXC0gs2XOe GcIWlXj5+B8ryBGiAnoS7/Z7QoQVJT6+2scI0Wog8f7cfGYI21qi5/JOqJHaEssWvmaGuEdQ 4uTMJywTGMVnIdk2C0n7LCTts5C0z0LSvoCRdRWjaHFqcXFuupGRXmpRZnJxcX6eXl5qySZG YAwe3PLbagfjweeOhxgFOBiVeHjvcaRHCrEmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLhvcAOFOJNSaysSi3Kjy8q zUktPsQozcGiJM7rsO9ChJBAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoHR588x3XTXKa1RoY1X4vv3v23r CxX43fU47PcznekTpr9hZBR6vMjwodFO0fDrwm81Wpwdr8ttPdh4/vY2j9aDG5IzvWpl3s29 HNdY5Dj9gZd00wO3WxvmqlSoLuhpmPhAps/lw/6/+TI1MyfvWTn9MUtPUkrJZUXv/mWHLBQ2 JW04GOCXLJWnxFKckWioxVxUnAgAAsKVT70CAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/MdzB0gX0h-IYMHaOJm4yiK1PSJw>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] country specific emergency URNs
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:38:34 -0000

Hi,

 

>>RFC 5031 defines semantics for the sos sub-service, and at least my
>>understanding is that sos is to be used for emergency services, and
>>nothing else.
>
>There is no limit expressed, or implied, that sos is restricted to
>³flashing lights² emergencies.  It¹s suggestive of emergency, but not
>exclusively used that way.
>The counter example was the non-emergency ambulance service.  Using
>sos.ambulance for a non emergency ambulance service, unless a country has
>both an emergency and a
>non-emergency ambulance service that needs urns, is appropriate I think.
>I don¹t think it would be wrong to create a non-emergency ambulance
>registration, but I also don¹t think we
>need to.

I think we should have separate URNs for emergency and non-emergency
services - no matter if the emg and non-emg services are provided in the
same country or in different countries.

>There is no MUST language at all.  Anything is acceptable, although the
>expert review gets to offer an opinion, and take it to the list if
>needed. 
>
>The review is merely supposed to make sure the service is distinct from
>an existing registration.  Registrations are cheap.

Not if we are going to have list discussions about the name whenever a URN
is to be registered. It would prolong the registration and, depending on
who participate in such discussions, the outcome would be very
inconsistent.

So, I strongly think that if the service is an emergency service, we use
sos. If the service is not an emergency service, we don¹t use sos.

And, *URNs* are cheap, so we are not going to ³run out of them² if we use
different ones for emergency services and non-emergency services.

 
>>If we start using non-sos for emergency services, and sos for
>>non-emergency services, I think we will end up in a messŠ
>
>The above example is how I think we don¹t get into a mess.  I don¹t think
>there is a good reason to create an ambulance service that isn¹t in the
>sos tree unless 
>we have an incidence of two services and we need to differentiate.  Even
>if the ambulance service in a country is not considered an emergency
>service, using sos.ambulance for it is fine in my opinion.

I have a different opinion :)

Regards,

Christer