IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 04 May 2014 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A001A0096 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.043
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DgQ__Vn-xtTD for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 07:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAB11A0092 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 07:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 79179 invoked from network); 4 May 2014 14:08:41 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 May 2014 14:08:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=60a.536649e9.k1405; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=s/AYeC4RUroRgZN2m6HRgpefFQ2pDChMF0cPmTsHQNQ=; b=G0EuKliznM809+37+7k1nIsUOMMr+biqfv80WYNK416a0QqeXDllp2mraw3H5kvELZDCGw9Nt3UCuAeWygfHjzC5pLklQWeRkKwO8xGtYbRVXEPyDhv5HtGLL6o5dL7QJGFnr3iNuwNWXLGH8qi695mqp8736m6MWAwPToN6UcLac97V9e7pf02+Gf6tTSGNtxCrDIueE8FZn440UKJvBSRCSuefjtb8hKCH7PVIC+FG0T6pOfxy24ruPxf8xyyR
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=60a.536649e9.k1405; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=s/AYeC4RUroRgZN2m6HRgpefFQ2pDChMF0cPmTsHQNQ=; b=mSgD2L1lV8H/Z/aZdP+Hw4CopKMfhArI/m13t3//YvHDQGFI/Krl6m1wrEVJzdDoAZYJZw2sv9sI8lRotL4YeajSegfv8trjCbKV1mnT4CdjUysZnTOd5nMSZE2MXim4rZHZ+m7ErX/6ZZdIfqQzp4U4tsCUc5iU39vh2OQ89wMppfcSIdzyu7RwAsQJ5OQxRG+1sqoOZehruPmutKK4LhxHNdoa8VKgrUhNqNokFK4pObv1sBXLY0x7vbSbwM4L
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 14:08:18 -0000
Message-ID: <20140504140818.1545.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5da0fca6-7eb3-4db6-8a71-16fce69e67e6@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/nDQ9HXsW2w2UEtx3NQDdlgfsKOA
Cc: arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 14:08:48 -0000

In article <5da0fca6-7eb3-4db6-8a71-16fce69e67e6@gulbrandsen.priv.no> you write:
>I may be stupid here, but why does dmarc even apply to messages with a 
>List-Id? Right now I can't think of any case where it makes sense to use 
>both List-Id and DMARC.

What do you think would happen if a List-ID: tag was a free pass
through spam filters?

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email