IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Sun, 27 June 2021 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805493A1EE0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBNk41aCfgA6; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86B513A1EDD; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id p8-20020a7bcc880000b02901dbb595a9f1so9778497wma.2; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=auzmSP0/kb/15PtJow7HsCsFsPOGYxjs4guTE9celg4=; b=Q0IsnGXOFDxQlMewrnl2E+7MLnWwN5cS6DLnkUWvocQ73x4Pmym373gjv9Y45/+Eo3 jL+gDpWIBarLRlsvhaE082oC4ZeDCshLdd77C6MBBay161Wyr3xgL3BhqqwidD9RkTEI Nh44rlV/pXE0Vow13oQdWFXqihldB0hnXcq8cy+PVSRIgnVTy1vGygNpotw6BzxSpmNi OpwM08CrPMaDqiz4xm3uXgArK+MkhbVFuEY+FW1G6xbN+ldgT9tOf+1Qs+5gPLLdndcK uBG2F1rqe/S8o+Jci9AXb/+HrSn/WlK3AaM51HepHhCXz0NCJNZF5UMd20qMpxp7aUgi AzUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=auzmSP0/kb/15PtJow7HsCsFsPOGYxjs4guTE9celg4=; b=NZ1TwqI1FhrxDV2XshynYrQDBglkSmyNx43x+BH2ameqxhlhp093dFFDnXTU6srPd5 F7HEm/kNQE/uRAG4Vw9SfVw0YhrbsMWZGTTMofBqBZjL7o0B+i45hPiRRI01yU4WQ4FC LCRepR/kxbzLVyvl2aOmMCs6CS5or9ZTVeirtTTv/0tn/LlU+EnoJ0PIZdOdj0oTliVM aFj1UIWptM4RI+g9oGmcpBDsys4IjDcpCfPtIyCiid/6qDr6MPKlL5zxelRd/75X8hyn RPf6ZhzN2Gosi3PHXsU7eS4KmdxiAyKadFMRuFuncFuMbi4aVZ3UlDR/AMVNTVSj4wce iwhg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Jwh2wUVCdUENyUmz2YjYKbQI033utsFw7fNndN6BlITC37CqN w36gE4NsHx0zo8iDKtmokuIA7KTJWy8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy48uqtnFgjy8yR0pdO9a8KJOXSIIkjx1I3llGYI8XJUrMD5qFaYiL6d377+x8iJKK/BGgpVg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3658:: with SMTP id y24mr22521402wmq.6.1624834811623; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.199] (c-24-5-53-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.53.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v11sm3684633wru.49.2021.06.27.16.00.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <69A0D415-BB13-423D-836D-C03D76503D38@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6EE4890F-3D35-439E-8707-12E9E0FDBB61"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Subject: Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:00:07 -0700
In-Reply-To: <9769f70c-61d6-d86d-cb2f-efa5a1ae1402@gmail.com>
Cc: NomCom-chair-2021@ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <c2148075-606d-8aa9-d7b4-71aa92a09fae@comcast.net> <1E2C4254-FE64-4862-8650-D5BA8A8CF86D@gmail.com> <3975.1624807060@localhost> <CAP8yD=tKs6jeMs-ZGUYoAWJqTAWTx5EzciEwsZGUrV9v8MFX4A@mail.gmail.com> <LO2P265MB0399544A2F5CC973B22CB9CBC2049@LO2P265MB0399.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <71ca761b-5987-3c5e-83f2-20a661e6a14f@joelhalpern.com> <69A4C2EB-60F9-458B-A4DD-86EF3AF4E6B7@gmail.com> <030701d76b96$77740e80$665c2b80$@acm.org> <9769f70c-61d6-d86d-cb2f-efa5a1ae1402@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-iywONv-4m05Y9kf6pFzc217g3Y>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 23:00:24 -0000

BTW, I received an email from the Nomcom chair a few days ago, saying that I had selected “willing to serve on the NomCom” on the registration form for a past IETF meeting,  so I suspect we may see a larger set of volunteers.   Or at least one larger, because I said “yes” :-)

Bob


> On Jun 27, 2021, at 3:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The exact wording of Path 1 in RFC8989 is:
> 
> "Attendance is as determined by the record keeping of the Secretariat for
> in-person meetings and is based on being a registered person who logged in for at least one session of an online IETF meeting."
> 
> But perhaps you qualified under Path 2 or 3?
> 
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 28-Jun-21 08:53, Larry Masinter wrote:
>> Unfortunately, after reviewing RFC 8989, I think there may be an issue with my qualifications.
>> 
>> At the 110 meeting, although I was registered (and got the T-shirt, thank you) I was unable to attend any working group meeting or plenary session. (Mainly time-zone issues).
>> 
>> I did try gather.town but didn’t find anyone to talk to.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Personally, I liked the idea of being on the nomcom after so many years, but perhaps reviewing actual participation (even just asking each volunteer to assert actual participation) might bring the process closer to its intent.
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email