Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

On 28-Jun-21 03:19, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]> wrote:
>     > Last year we had 135 volunteers, under the temporary criteria of
>     > RFC8788, which were basically the traditional criteria but set back by
>     > one meeting, i.e. physical attendance at 3 of IETFs 102, 103, 104, 105,
>     > and 106.
> 
>     > This year we have 112 volunteers, under the experimental criteria 
of
>     > RFC8989. Those are
> 
>     > a) registered attendance at 3 of IETFs 106, 107, 108, 109, and 110.  OR
>     > b) being a recent WG Chair or Secretary or RFC author.
> 
> Brian, given that you have the list of people, is it an easy thing to run
> through the Venn diagram and tell us if RFC8989 had any effect?

Not for me. Robert Sparks has access to current data, and there are
good privacy reasons why the data aren't open. (I had them as a special
case while drafting RFC8989.)

   Brian

> Should this discussion continue on gendispatch or shmoo or ??
> 
>     > Thus, we got fewer volunteers despite substantially broadening the
>     > criteria to include many more people.
> 
>     > This requires some reflection, but we can't arbitrarily change the
>     > mandated schedule.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>