Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Thu, 15 November 2012 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4580E21F89AA; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:27:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q3V12zv+fFhr; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:27:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:4038:0:16::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CDA21F871F; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:27:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291202012; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:27:00 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id INREHQvYeA3s; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:26:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from macpro.10ww.steffann.nl (macpro.10ww.steffann.nl [37.77.56.75]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377D200C; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:26:52 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <6E5736BD68F770449C74FBAD975F807C94AA4F0C@NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:26:52 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A0F47CBF-393D-4639-84E4-FC7240949CBD@steffann.nl>
References: <20121113144545.12836.71935.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKFn1SFy2+hXJLVtEpkdXfNuXA31ybmYnBFFPXj-73kb3tD+yw@mail.gmail.com> <5FCB8A98-4984-427C-9468-1DFDEBD206FD@steffann.nl> <87676878-B077-4B4C-96DC-9F755F78018A@gigix.net> <50A530E7.8@lacnic.net> <B8132154-7260-43B4-B10D-E5B95924A15D@gmail.com> <00C0245E-59D7-4552-8BB4-1C0099513D1D@steffann.nl> <6E5736BD68F770449C74FBAD975F807C94AA4F0C@NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local>
To: Paul Vinciguerra <pvinci@VinciConsulting.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:27:01 -0000

Hi,

>> One thing we have to be very careful with here is that EIDs are not directly
>> allocated/assigned to end sites from this block. That will cause everyone to
>> independently find (different) PITRs for their space, which will make a mess
>> of the global IPv6 routing table...
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sander
> 
> I don't think that (by definition) there is any way to cleanly aggregate PI space.  Legacy advertisements are going to be done by their LISP provider and will have to match the endpoint's PI allocations.

Yeah, so RIR policy-making communities might want to allow for LISP-PA space for example. I don't think we can make assumptions about that here. The other side of this is then: why not use 'normal' address space? If it is going to be announced in the legacy global BGP table anyway by some LISP provider I can't see why an end-site would choose for the LISP block instead of the more flexible regular block (which can then also be used as EID space)...

Thanks,
Sander