Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 16 November 2012 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A3521F8956 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:37:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6bEaue7NBM9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:37:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B8C21F8872 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:37:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAGHakgZ013119; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:36:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1353087411; bh=F8x6cfrIToi4IeJFaIWUyPUACG6XeQFQFqwHu5ANPjM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=FzwYLDcCyrU3Ocbm523wEIrc3AE3G2/LxLgDwq8vH7H7rwsCd3yhwlMwz2qnMMxxo 0C148mNeIGV99/QU6RgYPx70dP7xiyRV4uZXL6/UwkUUEL9kNzkMwWXwVD1FQ4JVZy l4vrI4yLo5HqXvD/UdqBz8J3NV/v9YwkgDQqgOyk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1353087411; i=@resistor.net; bh=F8x6cfrIToi4IeJFaIWUyPUACG6XeQFQFqwHu5ANPjM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=dWVPTSCpaJPEZoKCNDzKJdk4+8EoLGM8wrnsy6pktPCVNMwlIeeYs8MhF5QGrBvEq 2tsqsoq6gX9fk8IfScIAeuOhaYfAn+q6xEqR842c1VVOoS/OPgWb+EzYRNJsJmRGrK /WtUDvlwm+B/4VuXgP5j7UGLDMvvLUp5vKroKKtY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121116091244.0adda3a0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:36:02 -0800
To: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
In-Reply-To: <50A66B67.5000609@gmail.com>
References: <20121113144545.12836.71935.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKFn1SF4+k5gWip-WBNfbjt-qAafPbTSY8L_EBLA9Pqvbw4=kQ@mail.gmail.com> <50A66313.9090002@joelhalpern.com> <50A66B67.5000609@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:37:19 -0000

Hi Terry,

I posted a message [1] about draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03 and asked 
about the write-up.  Is there a write-up for 
draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block, and if so, where can I find it?

BTW, I don't see my comments being addressed.  Would it be possible 
to add a note for the Area Director about discontent? :-)

Regards,
-sm

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg75881.html