IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC

Paul Vinciguerra <pvinci@VinciConsulting.com> Thu, 15 November 2012 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <pvinci@VinciConsulting.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAD321F8604; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:22:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.436
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.163, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tF8zbv894Qz8; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange.vinci-consulting-corp.com (exchange.vinci-consulting-corp.com [38.125.5.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA8321F85FA; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local ([::1]) by NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:21:58 -0500
From: Paul Vinciguerra <pvinci@VinciConsulting.com>
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
Thread-Topic: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: AQHNw16z6nPAFQBGGECg4Vbwr2D40pfrokoA//+tu1A=
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:21:56 +0000
Message-ID: <6E5736BD68F770449C74FBAD975F807C94AA4F0C@NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local>
References: <20121113144545.12836.71935.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKFn1SFy2+hXJLVtEpkdXfNuXA31ybmYnBFFPXj-73kb3tD+yw@mail.gmail.com> <5FCB8A98-4984-427C-9468-1DFDEBD206FD@steffann.nl> <87676878-B077-4B4C-96DC-9F755F78018A@gigix.net> <50A530E7.8@lacnic.net> <B8132154-7260-43B4-B10D-E5B95924A15D@gmail.com> <00C0245E-59D7-4552-8BB4-1C0099513D1D@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <00C0245E-59D7-4552-8BB4-1C0099513D1D@steffann.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.10.14]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:43:07 -0800
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:22:04 -0000

> One thing we have to be very careful with here is that EIDs are not directly
> allocated/assigned to end sites from this block. That will cause everyone to
> independently find (different) PITRs for their space, which will make a mess
> of the global IPv6 routing table...
> 
> Thanks,
> Sander
 
I don't think that (by definition) there is any way to cleanly aggregate PI space.  Legacy advertisements are going to be done by their LISP provider and will have to match the endpoint's PI allocations.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email