IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC

Paul Vinciguerra <pvinci@VinciConsulting.com> Thu, 15 November 2012 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <pvinci@VinciConsulting.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D9721F893A; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:10:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OjgDRFxlyIFt; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange.vinci-consulting-corp.com (exchange.vinci-consulting-corp.com [38.125.5.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C461821F8932; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:09:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local ([::1]) by NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:09:58 -0500
From: Paul Vinciguerra <pvinci@VinciConsulting.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Subject: RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
Thread-Topic: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: Ac3DQXxYSz//3jgbSSusYJBGpYtnCg==
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:09:57 +0000
Message-ID: <6E5736BD68F770449C74FBAD975F807C94AA2C60@NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.10.14]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:09:12 -0800
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:10:00 -0000

> On 15 Nov. 2012, at 10:43 , Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I have to ask, who can request an netblock from this address space
> >> and from where?
> >> I might be blind but I couldn't find it mentioned anywhere.
> >
> > Good question. Will there be a central registry, or will parts of the space be
> delegated to i.e. LISP based ISPs?
> >
> 
> Hi Sander,
> 
> no central registry has been ever discussed, was more about delegated the
> space to LISP ISPs.

So there will be a pool of addresses that the RIR's can allocate out of for EIDs?  If that's the case, what is the additional value to an ISP who would conceivably have to pay the RIR for another block of V6 addresses specifically for use as EIDs, when most likely they are already paying for a block that can be used for either purpose? 
 
Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email