IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Thu, 15 November 2012 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB8F21F89B0; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:34:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lG6RX4GLeHsB; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:4038:0:16::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1262421F89AA; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4B52012; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:34:35 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dHXh5z9TzBoe; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:34:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from macpro.10ww.steffann.nl (macpro.10ww.steffann.nl [37.77.56.75]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE77200C; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:34:34 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <5958FE99-2975-490A-9F51-E56CFD9D384B@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:34:34 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <78C68165-E984-4974-B2D4-12A9A008A25E@steffann.nl>
References: <20121113144545.12836.71935.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKFn1SFy2+hXJLVtEpkdXfNuXA31ybmYnBFFPXj-73kb3tD+yw@mail.gmail.com> <5FCB8A98-4984-427C-9468-1DFDEBD206FD@steffann.nl> <87676878-B077-4B4C-96DC-9F755F78018A@gigix.net> <50A530E7.8@lacnic.net> <B8132154-7260-43B4-B10D-E5B95924A15D@gmail.com> <00C0245E-59D7-4552-8BB4-1C0099513D1D@steffann.nl> <6E5736BD68F770449C74FBAD975F807C94AA4F0C@NYDC-EXCH01.vinci-consulting-corp.local> <5958FE99-2975-490A-9F51-E56CFD9D384B@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Paul Vinciguerra <pvinci@VinciConsulting.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:34:36 -0000

Hi,

> And you do not want to tie addresses to topological entities. Or you will lose the mobility capabilities that Locator/ID separation can bring.

Well, it is a business model. I am providing exactly such a service to a few test users now. I now hand out EID space from my PA block. If someone wants to be provider independent I'll route their PI space for them as well. I'm just hoping that we can avoid any BGP routing table mess...

Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email