IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC

Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Thu, 22 November 2012 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070B121F868A; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:04:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNMFghDC76cv; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C196321F867D; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c13so4559187ieb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:04:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7YIuR98Vw24VjMvYpVNv0wnVeVcv+4nPqD/f4LHOemM=; b=xuEaV+pAobBCYGj5FbgGqszRj+b6qZYJWqU95Eom2O9PAgsSc0SAtwKOpSLRruqwvZ 6CoBhZFSlaB7VNiC40OcO4mL23aUnm7AbsPsD+gIHDEwJ7SCSs8XCqICn898GbZnpPZj UwsvXHFxrS5sZRqV5MRXwJqQNqVh4ExMSLFBzYCKApO76myCvEdqKdMDZ6yeblbTjktv Z3IbKGKjOglPsYZjQFV/pCHO5e463KeNnxHgabB5CICgO9wB1mSZPxQQWuHogw9sVGah pB5edLMA8DRfhUIg/9992+HmfuRtoSn89esmKyS5tMPlD4dCsKl5EvWYAyhAn8LM44a3 55jQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.209.65 with SMTP id mk1mr2558029igc.8.1353575083226; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:04:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.138.169 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:04:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A19BAA78-C359-4AB5-8C22-046938B64ACB@gmail.com>
References: <20121121175836.EE11B18C0D3@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD592303385FBF7A@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <A19BAA78-C359-4AB5-8C22-046938B64ACB@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:04:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SFz0g2ZmTudPOu4y1hY+u=BXG8awQUbWrwvbRzRxBsZtw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
From: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:04:46 -0000

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> Make it an allocation for EIDs and ILNP can use it too.

Somehow I hear a voice in the back of my head asking if we're talking
about starting to use another big IPv6 block than 2000::/3 for the two
above mention usage?

2000::/3 for our current model of Internet with our current style of
allocation/assignment of address space to ISP/end users
xxxx::/3 for future modells, LISP/EID, ILNP and others?



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj@gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger@jorgensen.no

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email