Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> Wed, 21 November 2012 19:12 UTC
Return-Path: <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6CD21F87E7; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:12:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZo-WlUu-YFF; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:12:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jade.coe.psu.ac.th (unknown [IPv6:2001:3c8:9009:181::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4839321F87DA; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from epsilon.noi.kre.to (jade.coe.psu.AC.TH [IPv6:2001:3c8:9007:1::21]) by jade.coe.psu.ac.th with ESMTP id qALJC7rA007625; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:12:08 +0700 (ICT)
Received: from epsilon.noi.kre.to (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by epsilon.noi.kre.to (8.14.4/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qALJ9lBF025273; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:09:47 +0700 (ICT)
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC
In-Reply-To: <99B9866C-41D6-4784-AA69-CD25E5910F4B@apnic.net>
References: <99B9866C-41D6-4784-AA69-CD25E5910F4B@apnic.net> <20121113144545.12836.71935.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKFn1SF4+k5gWip-WBNfbjt-qAafPbTSY8L_EBLA9Pqvbw4=kQ@mail.gmail.com> <50A66313.9090002@joelhalpern.com> <50A66B67.5000609@gmail.com> <50A67758.8000001@joelhalpern.com> <33C6C196-B881-4BAA-8E57-082B266C831A@steffann.nl> <50A6ADD0.3040000@joelhalpern.com> <45813A84-7BE9-4D21-AE3E-F3401D6E1B50@apnic.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:09:47 +0700
Message-ID: <19339.1353524987@epsilon.noi.kre.to>
Sender: kre@munnari.OZ.AU
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net>, John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>, "ietf@ietf.org List" <ietf@ietf.org>, lisp@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:12:31 -0000
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:16:58 +1100 From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Message-ID: <99B9866C-41D6-4784-AA69-CD25E5910F4B@apnic.net> I have no idea whether the allocation requested is reasonable or not, I haven't read the draft (and unless it becomes more widely used than currently, might never do so), but I do know that this argument ... | The guidelines for IP address allocations were documented in RFC2050, | adopted in November 1996 as a Best Current Practice. ... is totally bogus in these circumstances. The rules in RFCs and BCPs bind ordinary users making ordinary requests for address space - were I to approach IANA with a request for address space to be allocated, a quick denial quoting the relevant RFC would indeed be the correct response. But when the IETF publishes an updated RFC, that always overrides any earlier RFC, and establishes new policy - either for the general case, or perhaps (as seems to be happening here) just a one off override of the normal rules. Doing that is always acceptable, whatever the issue - it is never adequate to simply refuse to consider such requests upon the basis that they don't follow the rules and should be done some other way. Now, when the IETF (via the last call consensus mechanism) consider whether the proposed RFC should be published, it is perfectly reasonable to point out the existing policy, and ask for reasons why use of that mechanism would not be adequate - if the proponents cannnot explain why doing it the way they are suggesting is required, or at least is better than the normal way, then the request (to publish the RFC, not just to perform whatever allocation it requested - that just falls out of the failure to publish the RFC) should be refused. On the other hand, if the proponents can convince the IETF that the procedure they're suggesting is the best way to proceed, then that's what should happen - and that it isn't being done the way that the normal allocation rules would suggest it should be done is 100% irrelevant. If you have an argument against the proposal, please make it upon the merits of the request, and not based upon some supposed viloation of address allocation quidelines. What the result will be I have no idea - I don't know if this allocation should happen or not. I might suggest however, that if Noel is correct about the way this allocation would be used (and Noel usually is correct) then it may be that an assignment out of the 0::/3 address space (which is out of the ordinary allocation space for which the guidelines apply) sounds like it might be the right thing to do - perhaps something like 10f0::/12 (or something near there not currently allocated). kre
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt>… SM
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… George Michaelson
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt>… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Luigi Iannone
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt>… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Luigi Iannone
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt>… Luigi Iannone
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt>… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Paul Vinciguerra
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt>… SM
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Geoff Huston
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Arturo Servin
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Arturo Servin
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… George Michaelson
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Arturo Servin
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… George Michaelson
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… George Michaelson
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Arturo Servin
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Roger Jørgensen
- RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… George, Wes
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Paul Vinciguerra
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Paul Vinciguerra
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… SM
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Cameron Byrne
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Cameron Byrne
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Geoff Huston
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… heinerhummel
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Geoff Huston
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… SM
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… George, Wes
- RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Robert Elz
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Sander Steffann
- RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… George, Wes
- RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Geoff Huston
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Robert Elz
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Brian Haberman
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Luigi Iannone