Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 13:55 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEAF12D520 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oBSeU_YIFW_O for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C933012D52C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b73so68454810lfb.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+5pDQCdrheT0IlW8TFPJH8WyONfM2pILsI7cUNci7eg=; b=VPJHGjfv1dumDkYjZ1e75u1b3lSZBxd4PAGew6JkwxvOK5xUAvWYjitAnChf78P/jG Q/lTPf4APcQn5MKe6fzc1maZUYhEWw9QPVUn7AAnv3EoiTuJLY0s1nxfyNY0SHuHyTh5 AO5kusZmOVs2rJFWbzwjAoMSFJsBgpGnSVkCSnjfCspoaKfdx3LRIA2HvKhY0QYvu3Rk xMvJ6aLzVIQBYRdNsCpY0MpykaO5X0+EpfnAU/D2H3fR1tASTP6Y7MmaokGwJhV4M/5p DpQFtgKnFuoGRGj4DQigbRGQr+DzCok5Ys2vQ2RZXdYqG3z7d0tKkdMO2/roFdVSyLy+ iQVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+5pDQCdrheT0IlW8TFPJH8WyONfM2pILsI7cUNci7eg=; b=JSv5ke8DkBkoeHFuiDNX+N+1/ghjxJw0hTD7NSOO/X5gypOTUJh0Krpu9XZuSNnu3v k7g12jrQngv66oyn7qTLkdI/2kevD1ebm9/CxxYLWoW4UFNJgXQmxXbDUffgC8+BximM R5DBv7wnH+8dKbWwCZCJm60gsKajuqZMjXvcBKgae8QkJccsoxfwHfkwJ63zQGasj/1W 0GrBrTxKG4KIQ2PIET5sU3TdM32udoB38FQ2BVYAiIIwQO+OpK+ER+4LI+0z1qC4xrtf NhGzQhB0t2aA6KKe9ypvWlUrLbMJhruSlzDdXeecKq+IQa1BoO6G+ZKIRZjFSNjxJ8Xa KI5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJXA6WOSIWMz+ltK2gHsbZ4LCsZ/TJSgR6DhT5f79iDafK4NzWWIt0pZFJ53OuWTAeb/rI3zaUnvlMdjg==
X-Received: by 10.25.91.140 with SMTP id p134mr9141869lfb.181.1464702900684; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B052666C0FA@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org> <1C8639E6-1058-4D04-84ED-0C354E6567D1@cisco.com> <9CBABA69-1814-4676-9C69-E129F04AD24C@cisco.com> <5DFDEA43-8156-491D-A300-2BCED1AED1A4@gmail.com> <5747909C.20403@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2mGNPhUCzWyfAo_DYL3LhjkqRB13zXuj8wMqFQJfE4GA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3DnzzxeRE8QbkDHS9HCP2Lu8pTbR6o9_ZL21RNNqa2sg@mail.gmail.com> <5749E35E.9030201@si6networks.com> <67e1079c-0937-d09a-79a5-a6c0487a3285@joelhalpern.com> <D30A41979C540803EB84F486@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B052666C0FA@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:54:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=Prb=L4hfaMaHXuFMqh_nA=qWWOVU-OY3vQ1sACH07=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
To: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11400b4218dd46053423b897"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3nJWUpND91gTnKOligrKXb1Lsj0>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:55:09 -0000
It's worth mentioning, perhaps, that the fact that the a lot of the same people get to go to IETF every time can be seen either as a bug or a feature. It's a feature in the sense that if those people do work, work gets done. It's a bug in the sense that it's likely that by optimizing for that, we are excluding people who would benefit from coming to IETF when it is in their region, but can't manage it when it is not. Several comments in this thread have taken it as a given that making sure the same people always get to go is a priority. In fact, if those people felt a bit more disenfranchised they might be more eager to make sure that the remote attendance experience was better than it currently is. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:40 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) <MHammer@ag.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John C Klensin > > Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 7:32 PM > > To: Joel M. Halpern; Fernando Gont > > Cc: recentattendees@ietf.org; Ietf@Ietf. Org > > Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF > > 100 > > > > > > > > --On Saturday, May 28, 2016 2:34 PM -0400 "Joel M. Halpern" > > <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > > > > > Fernando, > > > Your response assumes that it is proven that moving to > > > less-participating locations increases long term participation from > > > those locales. There are also indications from other data that it is > > > not particularly effective. Thus, while your view is a reasonable > > > hypothesis, it will take time and measurements to confirm it. > > > > Let me take Joel's observation about the particular BA experiment a bit > > further. If, independent of who showed up at that meeting, it isn't > followed > > by a significant spike in long-term IETF participation and contributions > from > > the region, I think people who say "go there in spite of the fact that > there > > hasn't been a lot of participation from the region because participation > will > > increase" are going to have a very hard time making that case... for > either a > > return to Latin America or for any other region. > > > > I think it is unreasonable to set the bar at MUST have long term > significant spike in participation from a region after a single meeting > being held there. Without taking a position on whether meetings should be > held in particular locations, if the goal is to garner participation from a > wider geographic constituency then IETF needs to plan and invest to make > that happen beyond simply holding a single meeting in the region. > > > > I do note that many of our regular participants found BA to be > > > simply too much (by whatever measures they use) and chose not to come. > > > That is an observed cost that also must be factored in. > > > > That drop in attendance, and overall lower attendance, are significant > for > > other reasons, but, at least to me, further raise the bar for "going to > this new > > place will help the IETF" > > arguments. > > > > That is a different but related discussion. > > > > Also note that we did chose to conduct the experiment. > > > So I think your comparison is quite a ways off the mark. > > > > Indeed. > > > > john > > > > > >
- Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 IAOC Chair
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 George Michaelson
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Ted Hardie
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Margaret Cullen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jakob Heitz
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Ted Hardie
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [E] Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singa… Gross, Scott W
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Xiaohong Deng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mark Nottingham
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jose Saldana
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 tom p.
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ole Troan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… otroan
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Leslie Daigle
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Michael Richardson
- RE: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Harish Pillay
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 tom p.
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ted Lemon
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Melinda Shore
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… John C Klensin
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Keith Moore
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Carlos Martinez
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Keith Moore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joel Snyder
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joe Abley
- Re: IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: R… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Aaron Morgan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Derek Jett
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dan Harkins
- Why we meet (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Thompson, Jeff
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Success metrics Re: [Recentattendees] Background … Bill Mills
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Rich Kulawiec
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentatten… Melinda Shore
- RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jamie Baxter
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Hood
- Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Stephen Strowes
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Robert O'Callahan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John Levine
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John Levine
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Rich Kulawiec
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Naeem Khademi
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Alexander Nevalennyy
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mary B
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… David Morris
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Randal Atkinson
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tim Chown
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tim Chown
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Naeem Khademi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Brian Ford (brford)