Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

Marie-Jose Montpetit <> Wed, 25 May 2016 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2829C12DE34 for <>; Wed, 25 May 2016 16:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqW5kr-OoxwP for <>; Wed, 25 May 2016 16:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13BB512DE1F for <>; Wed, 25 May 2016 16:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id ww4so81435427igb.1 for <>; Wed, 25 May 2016 16:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PyUo5pp9CuSbv1htZKbPSwXJ52J9Rtb2B7nKEfNIvKk=; b=UFeQrdYtBi/lFmriLSYM5SBKwvw+NHZd3piE1Mj+LLx6iyis3YJjwLWkTx2qRNRucJ XcZ7QqnxThZ/MEqe8zsuEtqYZOKLNBjhXRmpVhpOAWAuWSaztGCc7gglHzhGQukZUVMv 18vsZs+x/yOt17pMDI/ju+fP9fwmMcbwc2K9tlzvs9IZ2/2D4cbsW+cL0oDrpxX2cCX6 cKYkLVg4D7M49Eni3pwpbDkwiV+btOAZryhTlqPdUMUPEly7hR2MW7ITwi0rx7EKkBYM p/zdaIWljWTdqJCZG2MSckPjSYvrsgcpr5HqICsYY8qNsTr16LzTQZ6Qj+Dy9ohud3S1 oAGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PyUo5pp9CuSbv1htZKbPSwXJ52J9Rtb2B7nKEfNIvKk=; b=i4oPZAcJp3TuhybN6448QHWmh0m/ikKrZ94+oWZdG9z8fbfXSC/PqckybEUZfB7IZ/ pYlgbyB0uqcSvNQnVRmzZhwvvGlIVTvn6zqgmhen8Ql06i992yacIDm46Zhp3J5hZIfB prdoNLMaTWEu1DuBcu68gvouSaipUZjbAgGcSh6eicOCDpdZWyuB6vojXmT3q2be5rJc D58IFcCuVRP8VYw8IR3dlAdToIINzz2zdyRhMTnVT2omPuLqz2ptsKCaa+zyl/RkoKCc IQgIliWCL1K6jWACnhAMPKujo4XDhn84U8GOTeu/ovV8OXgRtmRd4Gs6f18vP7q1PidY Kumw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL/aHDR1z/tBqitL5oEne36p36cMPlWbhqepHDYO4ToiZoeJpD6+XTyX58AAVtFOA==
X-Received: by with SMTP id q21mr5911631qgq.69.1464218064536; Wed, 25 May 2016 16:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id j46sm357758qgd.16.2016. (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 May 2016 16:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 19:14:23 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <>
To: Margaret Cullen <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <>
Cc:,, IETF Announcement List <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 23:43:57 -0000

I guess there are enough of us who are ready to give you money to compensate for that $150k.

> On May 25, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Margaret Cullen <> wrote:
> I understand that this is a very difficult situation, but I think you have left something important out of your list of pros and cons.  If we cancel the Singapore meeting, we get to say _this_ to the Singapore government, who wants us to meet there enough that they have offered us $150K in incentives for us to come there:
>> “    Singapore laws against same-sex relationships between men and
>>   preventing the recognition of same-sex marriages could create
>>   difficulties for same-sex partners and their children; these have
>>   discouraged affected members of our community from participating
>>   at the IETF meeting in November of 2017 and have also influenced
>>   others to decline to attend in principled solidarity with them.
>>   Accordingly, the IETF has decided to postpone indefinitely the meeting
>>   in Singapore and is pursuing alternative venues.”
> If, instead, we hold this milestone meeting in Singapore despite the fact that these issues have been raised, we are sending the message that we consider basic human rights violations to be no more of a disincentive to visiting a particular venue than visa issues, cost considerations, or other items that have been raised in this discussion as examples of why “no venue is perfect”.
> Margaret
> _______________________________________________
> Recentattendees mailing list