RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)

Christer Holmberg <> Fri, 27 May 2016 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BD012D0C7 for <>; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4O3362m8ac5e for <>; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7367C12D75D for <>; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79936d0000030e4-c3-57488c2cb658
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DF.1C.12516.C2C88475; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:04:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:04:28 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: Melinda Shore <>, "" <>
Subject: RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
Thread-Topic: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
Thread-Index: AQHRuEDnW7dJLR44gkuJAddbYotFm5/NE+mu
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 18:04:27 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37FF4C33ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpjkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbFdRVenxyPcYOotLYtnG+ezWLS1zWJx YPLYOesuu8eSJT+ZApiiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDJeTmtgLZiuWTF5xj+2Bsbpyl2MnBwSAiYS TxZ/Y4GwxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcIRR4svV6+wgCSGBJUDOba8uRg4ONgELie5/2iBhEQEfiXXH /zGDhIUFSiQmPfGBCJdK/FlymRUkLCJgJDH/nT1ImEVAVeJ4+wqwTbwCvhIrn/YyQ2w6yCRx b+JxsE2cArYS0589ZAaxGYHO+X5qDROIzSwgLtH0ZSUrxJkCEkv2nGeGsEUlXj7+xwpRky+x blYz1AJBiZMzn7BMYBSehaR9FpKyWUjKIOIGEl/e34aytSWWLXzNDGHrS3S/P82ELL6AkX0V o2hxanFxbrqRsV5qUWZycXF+nl5easkmRmDsHNzyW3cH4+rXjocYBTgYlXh4HxS6hwuxJpYV V+YeYpTgYFYS4bXo9ggX4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkzuv/UjFcSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUI JsvEwSnVwDh1UeKP/6d6XhcqrGdJ3vev9i2Lv2rpnTvmk375tl3TPfatZInXj42Ozzcf15i1 4P6rtiCJDVlTygNlbNT1/ZV3397xtpwn8P+ncJ929ttvGlmPy/2/+MTn2uKtuf/zzZpcXley Fsq/FhBOX/75zh22lNdWjJarr9103my4WuNb8O4KD+Fc3tVKLMUZiYZazEXFiQAjSXmGmQIA AA==
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 18:04:43 -0000

Maybe we should hold our meetings in Minecraft :)

Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Melinda Shore<>
Sent: ‎27/‎05/‎2016 20:55
Subject: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)

On 5/27/16 9:46 AM, Michael StJohns wrote:
> I would expect that we as an organization will continue to meet in
> person for probably the life of the organization.  We as humans are a
> social species, and, even with all the sturm und drang that's been on
> the various mailing list with respect to the meeting venue topics - at
> the end we will find more benefit than not to meet in person.

I think so, as well, but that doesn't mean that we can't
work to de-emphasize physical meetings - the choices aren't
between maintaining the status quo on the one hand or
completely eliminating meetings on the other.  (I know
you believe this as well this but it wasn't brought out in
what you wrote).

My own experience has been that it is possible to maintain
a good working relationship with the organization and to move
work along even while attending meetings sporadically, but it
does take some initiative on your own part, an understanding
of who to contact and how to contact them about various pieces
of work, and some sensitivity to remote participation issues
on the part of working group chairs.  Unfortunately the second
issue (an understanding of how to keep work rolling) does take
a bit of IETF experience to develop.