Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100


Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBB812DAE9; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.028
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ScUUk7ZUwFQA; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C561612D695; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (localhost6.localdomain6 []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBD11B875E; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:18:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from (unknown []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ESTGVMSP112", Issuer "ESTGVMSP112" (not verified)) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C79351B8746; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:18:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:18:52 +0200
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.506.2; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:17:50 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.0506.007; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:17:50 +0000
To: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <>, "Thompson, Jeff" <>, Dan Harkins <>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Topic: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:17:50 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US
Content-Language: es-ES
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.16.0.160506
authentication-results:; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;; dmarc=none action=none;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: []
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1bf2b891-a1d1-4ee7-3ed3-08d38639afc4
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB4PR06MB0640; 5:WZy3XAwEMuMhwdSBDYfN9wsFZzcXxEEjE6iHAnmrQgDRH624YufQeLs7hIH42RhWoUIWwYJoxaqkjv3i8zgPlyXwSzf/InhlZZIAoNr8RiGVI1tlZQu7sWqTBWOaEr9MyEshzt9TaIutlb6QjoKupQ==; 24:bzDqr5n46t760fI1GPAexz57K3kiZTc9SF4qoOLQO+S7mL4Denex/c513q1uAuaHnVt/UkaMowlMR2OxRYgaaddOLj4ydST1qWaPYuNY88U=; 7:iKclXOWt+pioN7/EsZcHyrp1Ioa1xTE34aglWmJ4z/rJC4ur4WCxqGTcLlefkCVFl6ZL+20rD7QCDw07PLK1zt8HxxvCoqlmADeu1Zs8+/TcZ6wX60K4muVTsvRkz7SWSKIKtXZoEndSece/ed5Cn4IwyGcOPM2br0Reg1TUyKLhy/hNgQ7lwKMDSBLkdabE
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB0640;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(35073007944872)(270544422350281);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:DB4PR06MB0640; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0640;
x-forefront-prvs: 09555FB1AD
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(59124004)(13464003)(377454003)(24454002)(8936002)(5008740100001)(3280700002)(81166006)(575784001)(189998001)(2171001)(83506001)(3660700001)(10400500002)(1220700001)(19580405001)(102836003)(586003)(33656002)(8676002)(19580395003)(86362001)(93886004)(6116002)(87936001)(5001770100001)(122556002)(4001350100001)(54356999)(3846002)(106116001)(5002640100001)(15975445007)(5004730100002)(92566002)(50986999)(76176999)(4326007)(66066001)(77096005)(36756003)(2950100001)(2900100001)(11100500001)(2906002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0640;; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2016 14:17:50.7941 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9744600e-3e04-492e-baa1-25ec245c6f10
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR06MB0640
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:19:02 -0000

Hi folks,

Interesting discussion… brings memories to me from the time I was very young and my country was a dictatorship and some citizens were more citizens than others.
So it’s about balancing many aspects here:
• Visitors feeling welcome
• The event being abused for a PR wash-up of the local cacique
• Locals being given the opportunity to interact with people with different backgrounds, etc.
• Etc. etc
I welcome these discussions, because in many other ‘global’ events they do not exist for the sake of money (Olympics, FIFA, FIBA, …). Sit back, relax and think it thoroughly through. And then, in the future, be consistent ☺

My -.2 cents in this discussion
Dr. Pedro A. Aranda Gutiérrez

Technology Exploration -
Network Innovation & Virtualisation
email: pedroa d0t aranda At telefonica d0t com
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
C/ Zurbarán,12
28010 Madrid, Spain

Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden.
Fragen sind da, um gestellt zu werden.
Georg Kreisler

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Recentattendees <> en nombre de "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <>
Fecha: viernes, 27 de mayo de 2016, 15:34
Para: "Thompson, Jeff" <>du>, Dan Harkins <>
CC: "" <>rg>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <>
Asunto: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf [] On Behalf Of Thompson, Jeff
>> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 3:55 AM
>> To: Dan Harkins
>> Cc:; Ietf@Ietf. Org
>> Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF
>> 100
>> On 2016/5/26, 21:11:51, "Recentattendees on behalf of Dan Harkins"
>> < on behalf of>
>> wrote:
>> >  I would also like to suggest that the ability of certain members to
>> >bring their family on a vacation that coincides with an IETF should not
>> >be a governing factor in venue selection. Many people like to launder a
>> >business trip into a family vacation (myself
>> >included!) but that's not why the IETF exists and it should have no
>> >bearing on where we meet.
>> So then, the IETF policy would read ³The IETF may hold meetings in countries
>> where the law declares some people less valid. If you are such a person, then
>> the IETF recommends that to avoid trouble with the law you should hide who
>> you are, including not bringing your family.²
>> Is this the organization that the IETF is going to be?
>> - Jeff
>Is there any country in the world that meets the standard your comment implies should be the IETF policy? Is this a case of perfection being the enemy of good? Perhaps it is a case of perfection being the enemy of reality. I don't know what IETF policy should be but I do recognize that there are very real limitations that constrain choices. I'll also point out that the choices made will constrain the choices of participants. I'm not advocating for any particular choice by the IETF with regard to meeting locations.
>Recentattendees mailing list


Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição