Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ <pedroa.aranda@telefonica.com> Fri, 27 May 2016 14:19 UTC
Return-Path: <pedroa.aranda@telefonica.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBB812DAE9; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ScUUk7ZUwFQA; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (smtpjc.telefonica.com [81.47.204.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C561612D695; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (localhost6.localdomain6 [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBD11B875E; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:18:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESTGVMSP112.EUROPE.telefonica.corp (unknown [10.92.4.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ESTGVMSP112", Issuer "ESTGVMSP112" (not verified)) by smtpjc.telefonica.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C79351B8746; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:18:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.92.5.139) by tls.telefonica.com (10.93.6.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:18:52 +0200
Received: from DB4PR06MB0639.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.161.13.145) by DB4PR06MB0640.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.161.13.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.506.2; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:17:50 +0000
Received: from DB4PR06MB0639.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.13.145]) by DB4PR06MB0639.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.13.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0506.007; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:17:50 +0000
From: PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ <pedroa.aranda@telefonica.com>
To: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com>, "Thompson, Jeff" <jefft0@remap.ucla.edu>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Topic: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Index: AQHRttJ9SxvaAtaLtEiATGzykbpbrZ/LqQwAgAAFxYCAAAsWAIAAGKcAgABbZACAAENCgIAAPmcAgAAX4ECAADF7AA==
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:17:50 +0000
Message-ID: <932CBCA3-AFDD-4E9B-8D1C-F346C80CEC83@telefonica.com>
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org> <1C8639E6-1058-4D04-84ED-0C354E6567D1@cisco.com> <9CBABA69-1814-4676-9C69-E129F04AD24C@cisco.com> <5DFDEA43-8156-491D-A300-2BCED1AED1A4@gmail.com> <5747909C.20403@si6networks.com> <955df2106aa2e12cefbd450be022e779.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <D36D49EE.35116%jefft0@remap.ucla.edu> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266663BF@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266663BF@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US
Content-Language: es-ES
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.16.0.160506
authentication-results: ag.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ag.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=telefonica.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [193.145.14.145]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1bf2b891-a1d1-4ee7-3ed3-08d38639afc4
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB4PR06MB0640; 5:WZy3XAwEMuMhwdSBDYfN9wsFZzcXxEEjE6iHAnmrQgDRH624YufQeLs7hIH42RhWoUIWwYJoxaqkjv3i8zgPlyXwSzf/InhlZZIAoNr8RiGVI1tlZQu7sWqTBWOaEr9MyEshzt9TaIutlb6QjoKupQ==; 24:bzDqr5n46t760fI1GPAexz57K3kiZTc9SF4qoOLQO+S7mL4Denex/c513q1uAuaHnVt/UkaMowlMR2OxRYgaaddOLj4ydST1qWaPYuNY88U=; 7:iKclXOWt+pioN7/EsZcHyrp1Ioa1xTE34aglWmJ4z/rJC4ur4WCxqGTcLlefkCVFl6ZL+20rD7QCDw07PLK1zt8HxxvCoqlmADeu1Zs8+/TcZ6wX60K4muVTsvRkz7SWSKIKtXZoEndSece/ed5Cn4IwyGcOPM2br0Reg1TUyKLhy/hNgQ7lwKMDSBLkdabE
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB0640;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB4PR06MB064094ACA4415B6F821A71839B420@DB4PR06MB0640.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(35073007944872)(270544422350281);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:DB4PR06MB0640; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0640;
x-forefront-prvs: 09555FB1AD
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(59124004)(13464003)(377454003)(24454002)(8936002)(5008740100001)(3280700002)(81166006)(575784001)(189998001)(2171001)(83506001)(3660700001)(10400500002)(1220700001)(19580405001)(102836003)(586003)(33656002)(8676002)(19580395003)(86362001)(93886004)(6116002)(87936001)(5001770100001)(122556002)(4001350100001)(54356999)(3846002)(106116001)(5002640100001)(15975445007)(5004730100002)(92566002)(50986999)(76176999)(4326007)(66066001)(77096005)(36756003)(2950100001)(2900100001)(11100500001)(2906002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0640; H:DB4PR06MB0639.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <EB9AE2296B7D75439A66890B25814106@eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2016 14:17:50.7941 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9744600e-3e04-492e-baa1-25ec245c6f10
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR06MB0640
X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5GQN_VwZyNWw-3dMNxXzh-_UDgk>
Cc: "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:19:02 -0000
Hi folks, Interesting discussion… brings memories to me from the time I was very young and my country was a dictatorship and some citizens were more citizens than others. So it’s about balancing many aspects here: • Visitors feeling welcome • The event being abused for a PR wash-up of the local cacique • Locals being given the opportunity to interact with people with different backgrounds, etc. • Etc. etc I welcome these discussions, because in many other ‘global’ events they do not exist for the sake of money (Olympics, FIFA, FIBA, …). Sit back, relax and think it thoroughly through. And then, in the future, be consistent ☺ My -.2 cents in this discussion --- Dr. Pedro A. Aranda Gutiérrez Technology Exploration - Network Innovation & Virtualisation email: pedroa d0t aranda At telefonica d0t com Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo C/ Zurbarán,12 28010 Madrid, Spain Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden. Fragen sind da, um gestellt zu werden. Georg Kreisler -----Mensaje original----- De: Recentattendees <recentattendees-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com> Fecha: viernes, 27 de mayo de 2016, 15:34 Para: "Thompson, Jeff" <jefft0@remap.ucla.edu>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> CC: "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org> Asunto: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thompson, Jeff >> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 3:55 AM >> To: Dan Harkins >> Cc: recentattendees@ietf.org; Ietf@Ietf. Org >> Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF >> 100 >> >> On 2016/5/26, 21:11:51, "Recentattendees on behalf of Dan Harkins" >> <recentattendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of dharkins@lounge.org> >> wrote: >> >> > I would also like to suggest that the ability of certain members to >> >bring their family on a vacation that coincides with an IETF should not >> >be a governing factor in venue selection. Many people like to launder a >> >business trip into a family vacation (myself >> >included!) but that's not why the IETF exists and it should have no >> >bearing on where we meet. >> >> So then, the IETF policy would read ³The IETF may hold meetings in countries >> where the law declares some people less valid. If you are such a person, then >> the IETF recommends that to avoid trouble with the law you should hide who >> you are, including not bringing your family.² >> >> Is this the organization that the IETF is going to be? >> >> - Jeff >> > >Jeff, > >Is there any country in the world that meets the standard your comment implies should be the IETF policy? Is this a case of perfection being the enemy of good? Perhaps it is a case of perfection being the enemy of reality. I don't know what IETF policy should be but I do recognize that there are very real limitations that constrain choices. I'll also point out that the choices made will constrain the choices of participants. I'm not advocating for any particular choice by the IETF with regard to meeting locations. > >Mike > >_______________________________________________ >Recentattendees mailing list >Recentattendees@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
- Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 IAOC Chair
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 George Michaelson
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Ted Hardie
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Margaret Cullen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jakob Heitz
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Ted Hardie
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [E] Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singa… Gross, Scott W
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Xiaohong Deng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mark Nottingham
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jose Saldana
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 tom p.
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ole Troan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… otroan
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Leslie Daigle
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Michael Richardson
- RE: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Harish Pillay
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 tom p.
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ted Lemon
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Melinda Shore
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… John C Klensin
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Keith Moore
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Carlos Martinez
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Keith Moore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joel Snyder
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joe Abley
- Re: IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: R… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Aaron Morgan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Derek Jett
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dan Harkins
- Why we meet (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Thompson, Jeff
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Success metrics Re: [Recentattendees] Background … Bill Mills
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Rich Kulawiec
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentatten… Melinda Shore
- RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jamie Baxter
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Hood
- Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Stephen Strowes
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Robert O'Callahan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John Levine
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John Levine
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Rich Kulawiec
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Naeem Khademi
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Alexander Nevalennyy
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mary B
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… David Morris
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Randal Atkinson
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tim Chown
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tim Chown
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Naeem Khademi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Brian Ford (brford)