Re: a brief pondering

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Mon, 23 March 2020 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2781A3A0F05 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wiiJplzjfMgF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F5B3A0F02 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966A938982; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:06:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62765F29; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:08:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Narelle Clark <narellec@gmail.com>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, ietf <IETF@ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Subject: Re: a brief pondering
In-Reply-To: <CACRMD1F3+xFU-y9W1WyrVudZGWj1zL8hYGjUWbSHxnvEsOD-Uw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fd6b7ee2-cdbe-14a1-0087-ce61282b22f6@lear.ch> <29D0DCA7-1D72-428F-A6DD-05511D90C039@cable.comcast.com> <CACRMD1F3+xFU-y9W1WyrVudZGWj1zL8hYGjUWbSHxnvEsOD-Uw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:08:20 -0400
Message-ID: <23760.1584997700@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4oJL9VRgLo-is1OeBeNQIhuzsTk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 21:09:11 -0000

Narelle Clark <narellec@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> Which leads me to a question: what can this community (and similar/adjacent ones) do
    >> productively together to help? What new things are happening on the network from
    >> which we can learn and quickly adapt/improve?

    > We can keep the internet running. That's what I'm being told to do!!
    > And we're onto it.

And there is more: people are now noticing when jitter and bufferbloat
actually matter, and ability to send A/V directly from end to end point
really does matter.

I just wish that more of the tools/platforms were:
1) supporting IPv6
2) providing better diagnostics as to what path a particular speaker was using.
3) am I having a problem transmitting, or are they having a problem receiving?

I think that we will see a direct relationship between using IPv6, and
seamless/trouble-free communications.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [