IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: a brief pondering

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 22 March 2020 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0F53A084B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 14:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxdKbdasljTo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 14:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D843A084A for <IETF@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 14:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id q19so12372830ljp.9 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 14:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Px0OSPloG6wNGoJUZcRrUndJBdFHqt8bwCwTrgSELAA=; b=IONDQSb9ZFo5D/7VnbNNMJiGrtoC5OoVwD/iKZBmNEkBrjrYxwC8wr3oX3b3m6CiD8 dc5MbsQl3JEvKLtqDw2jkvFBJNYEJf9sroSnohYoan78eoxHHzCtuVdi4QJTpbr2d+EQ XBsJEJy1nunaxjXMdy9bpbI9BAgZVK5nYSnjOh1rCPTr+wLI7zwZSRKfWyl6Lah1xe0/ YEpt469liVgMu7PcqqYT+dIP+mZR2Z2XfEroj6GqymcCQH827fVA+/7nrCZqMQsaIhjy ptnmsQOCXFlkc8AiM/voccpySqN3w6yoLAvSH+dXIDohZa0KVZjJeqUadpGkJkangjhO 1EHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Px0OSPloG6wNGoJUZcRrUndJBdFHqt8bwCwTrgSELAA=; b=dcetzOj8TPTeh0vSQ3rKoF943LUYzti8RpQEbhbzJH2OtqB0eaD0vE/Bc/YgTxvGh7 6xT3r40jpbTPZR6Y+NGjKu6Pvq893ExjfKckao8CSymNMx/MFBhD39u1QCm+lGoyLY4A RZI6gOvVTARDQOnrHdcQEHXPvhvuw4LqJVVKldEDuCPTvPR77N4gdKOhQ3DRSFG6h6vU Aid4B4JeV0B4gN41FY311xQi0ZC33vLDun1iKIGoPTIPDkZbBAwDe6E2APcUFuydOqwD J/RzDQ/0xf+ZP0y/CNNXjFMVL0sGpZLB3LpuEDQ/3dfc0yevizKgnLVTbNbZHZZ/wwbW 8nBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2l7On4baz70/VysRycWFPsjjA1AjWRh3ZE+4D4xedJzltX0nP0 r63lnDjIM6P19hJ+x7FGSYOPWiZXJ70o1qsAljR+SQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsQ2qsFUVdx97S03SeQWRCUn3A8wapmD0nNZ0ASwnAY0sW9WoBfCXrt4NUhNpk6cDuj9ygsexmt/S+o4rEtuDc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:964f:: with SMTP id z15mr12050058ljh.237.1584914153188; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 14:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <fd6b7ee2-cdbe-14a1-0087-ce61282b22f6@lear.ch> <29D0DCA7-1D72-428F-A6DD-05511D90C039@cable.comcast.com> <31A798F0-9DE0-4231-A768-76BA9A1A2180@tzi.org> <26B25A87-5820-462D-8279-8C82EC44EB16@lurchi.franken.de> <2DE1D3E9-EE59-479B-8624-29749E7F02D3@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <2DE1D3E9-EE59-479B-8624-29749E7F02D3@tzi.org>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:55:27 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-c=AAVXdLtFKLHXGOk5m_J-kdnd19nSSQU7b58ub3YfFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: a brief pondering
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, ietf <IETF@ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000019b2ce05a178956f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GsReSlRudlaz8_PICnleKmNWPqs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:55:57 -0000

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 8:52 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> On 2020-03-22, at 11:21, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The one thing that would be most useful for me right now would be a
> document with operational considerations for keeping WebRTC running (e.g.,
> How not to mess it up with your firewall).
> > Would that be another candidate for C238?
>
> Not sure that it needs to get stuck there, but yes, it might be a useful
> part of that suite of documents.  A lot of people here have been in the
> trenches long enough that they know deeply what breaks WebRTC in a
> firewall, and it would be a useful operational-area exercise to extract
> that knowledge and make it presentable (and RFP-referenceable!) to firewall
> builders and maintainers.
>

I was hoping Michael was kidding, but since he's not ...

As much as I enjoyed some getting some TSVWG doc unstuck from C238, someday
that cluster needs to finally empty out,

On a related note, I wonder if this document would be a candidate for MOPS?

Best,

Spencer


> Grüße, Carsten
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email