Re: a brief pondering

[Michael Tuexen <[e-mail]>]

> On 22. Mar 2020, at 22:55, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 8:52 AM Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On 2020-03-22, at 11:21, Michael Tuexen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > 
> >> The one thing that would be most useful for me right now would be a document with operational considerations for keeping WebRTC running (e.g., How not to mess it up with your firewall).
> > Would that be another candidate for C238?
> 
> Not sure that it needs to get stuck there, but yes, it might be a useful part of that suite of documents.  A lot of people here have been in the trenches long enough that they know deeply what breaks WebRTC in a firewall, and it would be a useful operational-area exercise to extract that knowledge and make it presentable (and RFP-referenceable!) to firewall builders and maintainers.
> 
> I was hoping Michael was kidding, but since he's not ... 
Michael was. But Carsten took is seriously. I would like to see such a document, but don't keep it
in the RFC editor queue for a long time...

Best regards
Michael
> 
> As much as I enjoyed some getting some TSVWG doc unstuck from C238, someday that cluster needs to finally empty out, 
> 
> On a related note, I wonder if this document would be a candidate for MOPS?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Spencer
>  
> Grüße, Carsten
>