Re: WebRTC (Re: a brief pondering)

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Thu, 23 April 2020 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E4C3A046A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 06:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5MilNFf8XTS6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 06:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp75.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp75.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE1A23A0440 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 06:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp18.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id EC65DE013A; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from [10.1.3.91] (S0106004268479ae3.cg.shawcable.net [50.66.148.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:24:59 -0400
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Message-Id: <6C39C41D-2A51-4CC2-B9C0-5965F7DBFB2D@iii.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1F010692-F74C-47CD-8F2C-647A972A03B9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:24:58 -0600
Subject: Re: WebRTC (Re: a brief pondering)
In-Reply-To: <196b7389-c2ed-755f-7c43-40e9da538869@alvestrand.no>
To: IETF Crazy <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <fd6b7ee2-cdbe-14a1-0087-ce61282b22f6@lear.ch> <29D0DCA7-1D72-428F-A6DD-05511D90C039@cable.comcast.com> <31A798F0-9DE0-4231-A768-76BA9A1A2180@tzi.org> <26B25A87-5820-462D-8279-8C82EC44EB16@lurchi.franken.de> <196b7389-c2ed-755f-7c43-40e9da538869@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
X-Classification-ID: 673fb9fa-8c36-4144-83c4-d9f3109a7927-1-1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LRoEQUdMjHwkoIYSURCN2z0tO50>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:25:02 -0000

> 
>>> The one thing that would be most useful for me right now would be a document with operational considerations for keeping WebRTC running (e.g., How not to mess it up with your firewall).

Do what https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4787 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4787> (BCP 127) recommends. That’s about it.