RE: IAOC Request for community feedback

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 23 October 2012 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F87121F86CE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.223, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pj6M5XQAGerz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D7E21F8644 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9NBeFeR025587 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:40:15 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9NBeCda025503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:40:14 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20121022234941.28301.7687.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121022234941.28301.7687.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: RE: IAOC Request for community feedback
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:40:11 +0100
Message-ID: <0f6301cdb113$2aab5960$80020c20$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHux+QtlrTbFLjMhqJjT8gO6gCowpeElJJw
Content-Language: en-gb
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:40:17 -0000

> The IAOC is requesting feedback from the community whether it is
> reasonable to declare Marshall's IAOC position vacant.

Yes, with regret. Marshall has done a lot of good stuff for us over the years, and I hope he is well and functioning.

However, Marshall filled a community-appointed post on the IAOC and it is important that the community is fully represented.

So please ask NomCom to fill the vacant position.

Adrian