IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Just so I'm clear

"Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net> Thu, 25 October 2012 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEC021F90D8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <yIdT01+IPvsq>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIdT01+IPvsq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from express.tndh.net (express.tndh.net [IPv6:2001:470:e930:1240:20d:56ff:fe04:4c0a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351D521F9037 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.144.31] (helo=eaglet) by express.tndh.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <alh-ietf@tndh.net>) id 1TRP2V-000EDL-2V; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:08:12 -0700
From: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
To: 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 'Doug Barton' <dougb@dougbarton.us>
References: <20121023192135.203AC18C0A4@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <5086EF82.9060900@dougbarton.us> <20121023200713.GC1861@nsn.com> <5086FBCE.2070503@dougbarton.us> <20121023213251.GF27557@verdi> <50873AB4.1000905@dougbarton.us> <20121024034736.GC52558@crankycanuck.ca> <50876D39.20502@dougbarton.us> <508773E7.10203@cisco.com> <50877633.1000402@dougbarton.us> <EA9BEA2E-EE96-4E80-B719-652BBD620A79@lilacglade.org> <508842C2.4020203@dougbarton.us> <5088EE5A.4090103@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5088EE5A.4090103@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Just so I'm clear
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:08:07 -0700
Message-ID: <01ef01cdb2c2$8a062330$9e126990$@tndh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQHh8wyhXJPu+L+ckiGZSgshdBMy0gH3avBPAb9jkuICgS4F6AI9qB72AUIb6loCmWavzgMFwvI0AiIqCvUCZdM2MgHlnrYNAhldDa4CU3itJpbQE+jQ
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 172.20.144.31
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: alh-ietf@tndh.net
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on express.tndh.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:08:17 -0000

Has anyone bothered to ask counsel for an opinion about the issues StJohns raised?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:47 AM
> To: Doug Barton
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Just so I'm clear
> 
> On 24/10/2012 20:34, Doug Barton wrote:
> ...
> > ... Nothing in the text suggests an
> > unfettered right of creating new definitions of "vacant."
> 
> You mean, new compared to the first definition in Merriam-Webster.com?
> 
> 1: not occupied by an incumbent, possessor, or officer <a vacant office>
> <vacant thrones>
> 
> Objectively and factually, that seems to be the case. The IAOC is actually
> going an extra mile rather than simply informing NomCom that the seat has
> become vacant.
> 
>     Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email