IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: For Review: IESG Statement on Guidance on Face-to-Face and Virtual Interim Meetings

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 11 December 2015 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187851ACE6E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:26:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eSTvcjYRsW9O for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED091ACE69 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:26:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C342CCBF; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:26:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSmQjzd_ihuy; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:26:15 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406062CCAE; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:26:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: For Review: IESG Statement on Guidance on Face-to-Face and Virtual Interim Meetings
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_16D49F7D-7B4F-4E05-8D0F-CE64994535DC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <566A95C3.8040106@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:26:13 +0200
Message-Id: <EBDBB16E-2508-4EBC-81B8-D8C4BAF7BF7A@piuha.net>
References: <20151210164031.22024.98672.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEBFAA5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <A588E0AF-ADA4-4A3B-8C53-264A7812B1E0@piuha.net> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC023E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <566A95C3.8040106@cisco.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9QSFlFrI3DK2usO4qng4nBKz-Bs>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:26:49 -0000

Dan, Benoit,

I am in agreement with Dan that setting up remote participation is crucial
(and I’ve been arguing that to be done for specific meetings), but I guess
I am also opposed to hard and fast rules :-) Maybe that is a bit inconsistent,
but I like to think of things like the remote participation as “(strong) guidance”
whereas the the set of actual rules should be very small…

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email