IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: For Review: IESG Statement on Guidance on Face-to-Face and Virtual Interim Meetings

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 10 December 2015 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C271B2A35 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:02:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hb1-ivaxKM5z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546B51B2A4A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:01:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12512CE21; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:01:33 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2a8uEuK8CvLx; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:01:33 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E8D2CCE5; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:01:33 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: For Review: IESG Statement on Guidance on Face-to-Face and Virtual Interim Meetings
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_95ABB9F3-8985-41E0-8EC0-E5B3E7964B59"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEBFAA5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:01:32 +0200
Message-Id: <A588E0AF-ADA4-4A3B-8C53-264A7812B1E0@piuha.net>
References: <20151210164031.22024.98672.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEBFAA5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wzZh_3LmTxQMa73fg3j9ku53ERg>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:02:06 -0000

Dan,

> I suggest to add the following bullet to the face-to-face interim guidelines:
> 
> - Remote participation (via Meetecho or similar) must be provided

I think that’s a good addition, although I’d probably use the keyword
‘should’ to leave some wiggle room for special situations. We don’t
need to specify everything that the working groups do as rules.
If the WG has reasonable leadership, they will do the right thing.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email