IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: For Review: IESG Statement on Guidance on Face-to-Face and Virtual Interim Meetings

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B331B2B24 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:07:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZuFe9yg6IWDG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:07:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2FDF1B2B26 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:07:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost by e33.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <ietf@ietf.org> from <narten@us.ibm.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:09 -0700
Received: from d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.178) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:07 -0700
X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com
X-IBM-MailFrom: narten@us.ibm.com
X-IBM-RcptTo: ietf@ietf.org
Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D242A3E4003E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:06 -0700 (MST)
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id tBAL76UZ23658552 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:06 -0700
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id tBAL76oV022562 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:06 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com ([9.80.106.168]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id tBAL75m6022479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:06 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com.us.ibm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.12.5) with ESMTP id tBAL74q3008351 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:07:05 -0500
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:07:04 -0500
Message-ID: <m37fkm9fnr.wl-narten@us.ibm.com>
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: For Review: IESG Statement on Guidance on Face-to-Face and Virtual Interim Meetings
In-Reply-To: <20151210164031.22024.98672.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20151210164031.22024.98672.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/23.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 15121021-0009-0000-0000-00001076A882
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kXWI8rUXWqa0kXkprvwgS_IA3x4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:07:14 -0000

Mostly good stuff.

One nit:

>        Detailed minutes, including a list of attendees, must be sent
>        to the working group mailing list and, within 10 days of the
>        event (and at least 48 hours before subsequent meeting),

Why "detailed" as opposed to the normal minutes? Adding "detailed" to
me suggests that these minutes are perhaps different from regular
minutes, as documented by our existing documents. I would assume the
requirements for minutes are (and should be) the same for interim
meetings as for regular meetings. If so, just say so?

Thomas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email