Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 10 January 2023 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6D8C09A5D9; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:23:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.096, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-UnqnbmUGoU; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com (mail-ot1-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DF10C0B79F2; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id k44-20020a9d19af000000b00683e176ab01so7736545otk.13; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:23:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=MWK5gaHGVH2fHeUJJfN/T2HI3k1l8zVhG55oSRng6LQ=; b=UFeQxLkRe3dEkAglq566lpS7dVep8W0W8FlgXwloj4PEKVlHMwuqRqHBCBFSZ65r2t 8JF1fORDa0Bdt1SorocysmACgebEqZweRGyQQ5bc9V3y+ftmlm+ReFpslnJ4+xa8QonV AjNuz6aHaBReTuZKd2zz6vKPTdOw5u3gvC+AUjLj0yk8qwNkoWBcvUqqy5cLiqdkpQF/ 4NjTkkUHOn+irSw19tDe2lFZLpVjfiRjmx6vNaAIywq1Po5ZXytVELLDYMLvMs0NWkWy WeXUKvZxw7qvkMbxfVekIawC+hIXCKNCnUmfiB7QrbZk8I/FH3y1VHnxYx8TXifrJT/0 BqFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqXcavHU9/GEgXiIxdTo/CiF9P4lipTBia/KLkJx8rX4Q8CrHf+ giYkPJsiE45N3S+tIYW5VmUJmJaJgohfAGpZD37n7TZJ7ys=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtuT6SkO8+eWKpLN0dCjxYwuSggsx8IZrlRMG3L8s7Hy4EBOU7zz2GStphdvc+a5tiYI0yzP3O1ZO2WO0YYnzs=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4d98:0:b0:66d:6c11:109f with SMTP id u24-20020a9d4d98000000b0066d6c11109fmr3685604otk.194.1673385825468; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:23:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <HE1PR0701MB305098F652DBC34E3C40810B89F49@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <764163366.39904.1672842828297@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <CABcZeBNA_nJ2waQVENUvEXro91wAYOcH0ZxWqbLH4hoKcGkosw@mail.gmail.com> <9658281.42904.1672912808774@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <CA+9kkMBLiijcAyLYn_6h8z3N00EDaxdP=f7P2-qUt4Bn1iSWEg@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB30505DC24A725E014D60FE0189FA9@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <560fae4b-8624-f4ff-63a9-78e4362a5939@netmagic.com> <CAFzihuVwNEhW0trz6UP-KC6YNOFp+puvUcDkroVJkPXjSe8drQ@mail.gmail.com> <9F859ABE-6AB0-4376-9395-ACA9431AE073@mnot.net> <1221085435.61245.1673262868813@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <CAMm+LwiBK5qPYR41OdW=ANfFYPZTOMysGZF7OjJzt5MzuvZ-YA@mail.gmail.com> <640b25d4-b564-e6a5-dedf-c7cc088f82ee@netmagic.com> <CAMm+Lwg55EPH025_Pk7qdzovb_GybAHLrKLXD53sH-1KKK-PBQ@mail.gmail.com> <cd734429-4b87-a772-128b-0a33ff3feeb1@netmagic.com>
In-Reply-To: <cd734429-4b87-a772-128b-0a33ff3feeb1@netmagic.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:23:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwiGWYCV-dD+dp0kgBYNCxf4TwkVPhDx2KsU6-Hy8KevXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
To: trutkowski@netmagic.com
Cc: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "hrpc@irtf.org" <hrpc@irtf.org>, "pearg@irtf.org" <pearg@irtf.org>, saag <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b3064705f1ef7ffa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BnI0RvTuhjicVyCBGV2ZVryN7VE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 21:23:48 -0000

Umm, you miss out the fact that much of that style of thinking came out of
groups like The Work and Ithiel de Sola Pool's colleagues at MIT:
Technologies of Freedom, transformational technologies, etc. etc.

On the face of it, the thinking behind the Internet is no less absurd than
promoting conceptual art in the 1950s as a bulwark against Socialist
Realism. But they did it because conceptual art makes people think and
there is a rather popular art museum in NYC named for a CIA agent as a
consequence.

Neither the US establishment in general nor the security establishment was
ever as unified behind what is generally imagined to be the establishment
view that cryptography is bad, etc. etc. Rather more interestingly perhaps,
the parts of the security establishment that was most aggressively opposed
to communism, being committed to defeating it, was supportive of technology
and cryptography while it was the faction that preferred coexistence with
communism that attempted control.


On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:36 PM Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski.netmagic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Phil.  You have captured the essence of the IETF.  It is their home - and
> how most of the world views that collective.  And at some level it has
> value to different people and institutions, especially the participants.
>
> What has been forever amazing over the past 25 years, however, is how a
> virtual internet concept devised by Louis Pouzin and imbued with lots of
> funding for tinkering by DARPA and then NSF, became the foundation for a
> religious cult that views themselves as the all-powerful guardians of some
> self-implementing specifications that are the salvation of humankind.  You
> have to admit, that is freaky.
>
> Enough said....
>
> --tony r
>
>
> On 1/9/2023 12:27 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
> You miss out people like myself: Technologists with a personal agenda and
> independent means to pursue it. The Internet has always been shaped by
> hacktivism.
>
>