IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code...

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Mon, 03 December 2012 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFC021F8430 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 09:06:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zt-fCnDyeQLb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 09:06:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D9221F88EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 09:06:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:fca2:179c:bd27:c87e] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:fca2:179c:bd27:c87e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C420920193; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:06:02 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <50BCDBFE.3080701@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:06:06 -0800
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121122 Icedove/10.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code...
References: <50BA64AB.3010106@cs.tcd.ie> <50BCD637.3030009@acm.org> <50BCD962.3020007@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <50BCD962.3020007@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:06:05 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/03/2012 08:54 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> On 12/03/2012 04:41 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>> I support this idea, but I think that free software should also be
>> considered as part of this experiment (free software and open source are
>> not synonymous). Using the acronym FOSS and defining it as Free or Open
>> Source Software in the document would achieve this.
> 
> Fair point. OTOH, there are folks who want to not require open-source too.
> For now, I'd gone with "ideally open-source." As I said to Sam, let's deal
> with that, if need be, at IETF LC.

OK, but note that I will oppose for this experiment the use of software that
is not either available in source form or accompanied with a conformance test
suite.

> 
> In the meantime, I've posted -01 [1] with a bunch of changes. Do let me
> know if I forgot to ack someone and as before all comments (inevitable,
> this being a process thing;-) are very welcome.
> 
> Thanks, S.
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-ft-01
> 


- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=30oW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email