Re: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm

SM <> Sun, 12 August 2012 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D8021F85E4; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ba3B4eUYbVZJ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED07421F85EF; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (IDENT:sm@localhost []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7C0OPZi014689; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1344731071; bh=rqcxsY5LI8D5nAIXyGxZoNVxftNY3cVCiO+O7ejdi+U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=v3hwOsHjCoC56T+mCl5J+hhTbrNu/1rKSIpzUaRKZPEClr+r1GjO5Q7qoAtrRBRUF bGIpW09Ffl7tdvd2qsRk+J9Jpk7bcF+oY/0Nu6J69ZGwTC3ze2BVloWDyGKOVayBgN 7A0cdx6gCFE+/KsfiA3ekJPGaBmUNEfV8PFdwpbM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1344731071;; bh=rqcxsY5LI8D5nAIXyGxZoNVxftNY3cVCiO+O7ejdi+U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=c9sbusttJwcU767ZQxUgcrXrgLYBgeZrq/6bg3kWTwaYixNjZ+5SKhfbmhjCxtAFp epHgdAuz2tkxp27g8BA2fDPYZuiN/wfdAH48zhldXgYdGj3XlXuPmEdhPxaxwv12R0 IuwpiWu0brDFJ4KbOdbeXasCvWWiOLKbnPaAnap4=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:06:08 -0700
To: Yoav Nir <>
From: SM <>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: IAB <>,
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:24:45 -0000

Hi Yoav,
At 13:08 11-08-2012, Yoav Nir wrote:
>These operators are (hypothetically) Libyan citizens, 
>right?  Residents of Libya who


>The number of international gateways does not matter, if all the 
>operators have to comply with the government's blacklist, or have to 
>install a government-mandated policy on a government-mandated firewall.


As these government-mandated policies only end up intercepting HTTP 
traffic it not worth the bother arguing about it.  The entertaining 
part of the government blacklists is that they are maintained by an 
organization in another country.

>Not trusting the certificate just means you get annoying warnings. 
>It won't let you circumvent it. Living in an authoritarian country 
>means you don't get to play cat & mouse with your government

In most countries you don't play cat and mouse with the government.

>I thought it was Al Gore running the Internet from his garage, no?