Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Wed, 30 March 2016 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F0712D79F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fNDC_saS3zz2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBF9112D7AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79f86d00000400a-62-56fbf5b855b8
Received: from ESESSHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.24]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D3.C6.16394.8B5FBF65; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:50:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [148.135.149.145] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:49:45 +0200
Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <0000431F-F977-4A24-BA4D-064F740977A0@piuha.net>
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <56FBF599.9080605@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:49:45 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0000431F-F977-4A24-BA4D-064F740977A0@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7hO7Or7/DDC53M1k82zifxWLGvhVs DkweS5b8ZPLYumQ6WwBTFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfG/B0tzAWXeSu2vbvD3MD4jKuLkZNDQsBE 4syiIywQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBI4wSvy4uZUJwlnLKDFrbwsTSJWwQL5E088lYLaIgLXE2WcX GEFsIQEbifsT1oHZbAIWEltu3QebyiugLfFkzw9WEJtFQFVi8c0nYHFRgRiJ4+/OMULUCEqc nAkR5xSwlfiw8BJYnFnAQOLIojmsELa8RPPW2cwQu7Qllj9rYZnAKDALSfssJC2zkLQsYGRe xShanFqclJtuZKyXWpSZXFycn6eXl1qyiREYmAe3/FbdwXj5jeMhRgEORiUeXgXj32FCrIll xZW5hxglOJiVRHiFPwOFeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMUpzsCiJ87J+uhwmJJCeWJKanZpakFoE k2Xi4JRqYHTf57Zlt3v33SPfmu8ZdLJvfeFyxdlWzGHL1Vczdgflfvisp51QqZFoccVL4+Gb z7ucu/lvP2T12pcp0/C/5Zv+/fiAm+1nTzKK5t7iid2wXFOK8/C8LyuVK3fKz73EXBdkOkO6 onapguS9d08/LnoVl6oZ91yc37/7uvQta03DZf+WRCz011FiKc5INNRiLipOBAB6Mi/FSAIA AA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NR2xFIXa1K4EvfTMGPNcfBTRL0U>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:50:21 -0000

Hi,

Section 1 (Definitions), subsection k says the following:

>       Without limiting the generality of the
>       foregoing, acting as a working group chair or Area Director
>       constitutes "Participating" in all activities of the relevant
>       working group or area.

The AD of a large area may not get to read all individual I-Ds or all
email messages sent in all the WGs of the area. We may want to define
this a bit more explicitly.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 22/03/2016 2:17 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> RFC 3979 was published in 2005. Since then we’ve gathered a lot of experience, and we’d like to update the RFC with that experience. This isn’t a revolution of the IETF IPR approach, it is mostly about clarification, better documentation, and recognising some other new RFCs and changes. But the document itself has changed quite a lot and structured differently than RFC 3979 was.
> 
> Some of the main issues (such as how to define participation) were discussed in the IETF-87 meeting, but there are also a number of other changes in this document. Please give this document a careful read, and let us know your feedback.
> 
> I am starting a last call on this document today, but gave a longer last call period to make sure everyone has enough time to comment after IETF-95 as well. And thanks for the comments that some of you have already sent after the document was published; we’ve observed them and will make them part of the feedback from the Last Call.
> 
> The document is available here:
> 
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bradner-rfc3979bis/
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08
> 
> Jari Arkko (as the responsible AD for this document)
>