RE: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 28 March 2016 11:02 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E91112D876 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z5-fW2YqATGa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D67EC12D874 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u2SB1vKJ015395; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:01:57 +0100
Received: from 950129200 ([79.141.128.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u2SB1uVE015389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:01:56 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'S Moonesamy'" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "'Tobias Gondrom'" <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
References: <20160316170239.30920.41218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160318005648.0e552fc8@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net>
Subject: RE: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:01:55 +0100
Message-ID: <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGqHgJpSkwH6EN0dnciip6q6yy8PgKZKt6aAcSqI/6fmpeFIA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22224.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.735-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.735-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: L8tZF6zWW2oUSvuFnv7eo+Gonqgs5zxBju+GX08gELBkWz0ttP/JWZCs pGW1N3IAN9JBjNPuvGnxTwx4UJIMcvnVY0DWsTq3F9jfTqcDduhA5wWZjBcA8sXt25YNeIUSmpH wzKUTgZLL4XxYdGKOiGg+wcp6zRrYHe63Fw/UdwhIRA38P/dwboPfQve7FwfAEoivowdkUnXcox 7yUEOpFB1v5hWn6njkY62LUCVEsdZEXwnTCGfm3UK9qlwiTElfylIdsC5UWr6bKItl61J/ycnjL TA/UDoApPKClyoUSzyNo+PRbWqfRDsAVzN+Ov/sDgmZFW9ysv4rRQGNGW9/BlmkmLRy76GEzCZj dSXzrIRZsOUS1adf6A==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WJIPZh7Or9SDX_m0DDOZtMjYwj8>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:02:23 -0000

I didn't see a response to mine of 16th March, either.
I assumed that the IAOC would be bunching together the input and then sending a
considered reply.
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
> Sent: 28 March 2016 11:37
> To: Tobias Gondrom
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
> 
> Hi Tobias,
> 
> The IAOC solicited community input about a proposed IETF Privacy
> Policy [1] on 16 March.  I sent an email on 18 March in which I asked
> a few questions [2].  I neither received any answers to those
> questions nor did I find any answers in the ietf@ietf.org mailing
> list archive.  I tried to find out whether there were any answers in
> the IAOC minutes.  I could not find any (published) minutes for
> January or February.
> 
> I would appreciate if you could bring those questions to the
> attention of the IAOC and provide the answers.
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> 
> 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97181.html
> 2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97207.html